Re: [reSIProcate] A couple more minor issues from torture-tests

[Byron Campen <bcampen@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

	Is 416 an appropriate response for an unsupported scheme in a To  
header as opposed to the Request-Uri?

Best regards,
Byron Campen

> On Aug 8, 2006, at 10:18 AM, Byron Campen wrote:
>
> > 1. Currently ServerRegistration succeeds when the aor has a scheme  
> > other than sip or sips. This is a pretty easy fix (in  
> > ServerRegistration::dispatch, we check the scheme, and send a 400  
> > if it isn't correct).
> 416?
>
> > 2. Currently, the authentication functions in Helper do not check  
> > whether the authentication scheme is "Digest" (they assume that  
> > "Digest" is being used without verifying whether this is true).  
> > This is also easily fixed.
> >
> > Unless anyone has objections, I will be applying fixes for these  
> > to the main trunk.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Byron Campen_______________________________________________
> > resiprocate-devel mailing list
> > resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature