< Previous by Date | Date Index | Next by Date > |
< Previous in Thread | Thread Index | Next in Thread > |
Byron,
I was using the To header as an example. Request-Uri is
obviously more appropriate. However, looking at the various args to
MessageFilterRule(...) I can't determine which part could be used for a Header
filter.
The choices are (and my ideas of their
applicability):
SchemeList - should be don't care
HostpartTypes - should be don't care
HostpartList - should be don't care
MethodList - SIP methods - this looks like the one to use
but don't know how to set a specific Request-Uri
EventList - probably want to use this one too since I'm
using REFER.
The above is based on my examination of
MessageFilterRule.cxx. I have not pulled an SVN update since 2/06. Maybe the
file has changed to add additional functionality??
Which one is appropriate to set Request-Uri=sip:X@xxxxx for all Methods and
Events.
Bill Kovar
Avaya Inc.
(732) 852-2609
From: Byron Campen [mailto:bcampen@xxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Monday, August 07, 2006 5:50 PM To: Kovar, William (Bill) Cc: resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [reSIProcate] Many DUM -> one SipStack... Does it actually work?? Why are you
making routing decisions based on the contents of the To header? The To: header
is not intended to drive routing; that is the job of the Request-Uri.
Best regards,
Byron Campen
|