Re: [reSIProcate] To DUM or not to DUM
It is probably more on the revolutionary side of things but it would
not be too difficult to port from v1 to v2. v2 will probably be
several months in the making so I would advise to proceed with v1.
On 5/30/06, Craig Scott <Craig.Scott@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Thanks for that Jason. Is DUMv2 evolution of revolution - should I wait
for v2?
Thanks
Craig
-----Original Message-----
From: jason.fischl@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:jason.fischl@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Jason Fischl
Sent: 30 May 2006 17:18
To: Craig Scott
Cc: resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [reSIProcate] To DUM or not to DUM
dum is appropriate for any user agent application and is highly
recommended. It will be supported going forward although we are having
a coding session this coming weekend to work on a dumv2.
On 5/30/06, Craig Scott <Craig.Scott@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> Can anyone point me (a resip newbie) to any information regarding when
to
> use DUM (and when not to) Is there anything significant in terms of
> functionality or scalability that I will not be able to do if I use
the DUM
> (I'm thinking B2BUA, Voicemail and call routing apps - autoattendants
etc.)
> Is DUM something that will be 'supported' going forward?
>
>
>
> Thanks for any pointers.
>
>
>
> Regards
>
>
>
> Craig
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> resiprocate-devel mailing list
> resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel
>
>