Re: [reSIProcate] Re: DUM version 2 work session
We're good with the proposed dates. Decision on participants to follow.
Thanks.
/a
Adam Roach wrote:
> Sorry for the slow response; Robert is still away on vacation (he took
> two week off after SIPit); since he's quite possibly one of the people
> we'll be sending, I'd like to give him a chance to look at the dates
> before we lock them down.
>
> He'll be back next Monday. Will it cause you too much hardship to put
> this off another week?
>
> /a
>
> Alan Hawrylyshen wrote:
>
>> They work for me.
>> A
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: "Jason Fischl" <jason@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 21:43:04 To:"Alan Hawrylyshen"
>> <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc:"Scott Godin" <slgodin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Derek MacDonald"
>> <derek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "david Butcher"
>> <davidlbutcher@xxxxxxxxx>, resiprocate-devel
>> <resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Subject: Re: [reSIProcate] Re: DUM version 2 work session
>>
>> Are we good with these dates? I'd like to lock it into my schedule asap.
>>
>> On 4/28/06, Alan Hawrylyshen <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Apr 28, 2006, at 08.18, Scott Godin wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> OK with me!
>>>>
>>> Yup.
>>>
>>> A
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> resiprocate-devel mailing list
>> resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> resiprocate-devel mailing list
> resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel
>