RE: [reSIProcate] DUM version 2 work session
I for one, would like to include support for the implied subscription
models used by cisco for DTMF/KPML/MWI without modifying the core DUM.
Apparently no one else does though, as my previous thread about it got
no response.
-----Original Message-----
From: resiprocate-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:resiprocate-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Jason Fischl
Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 7:03 PM
To: Hong Yu
Cc: resiprocate-devel
Subject: Re: [reSIProcate] DUM version 2 work session
On 4/19/06, Hong Yu <hyu@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> One thing I'd like to see addressed is a better way of managing
> Transports, for example, removing of a transport at runtime. Also,
> fuller support of SUBSCRIBE/NOTIFY is definitely needed.
>
Can you be more explicit on what you mean by fuller support of
SUB/NOTIFY?
_______________________________________________
resiprocate-devel mailing list
resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel