[reSIProcate] Fwd: [reSIProcate-commit] COMMIT: resiprocate 6128 moetje: Added STUN client support
I'd like to propose that we reconsider this particular interface change. It has a few implications that I am not sure are consistent with our design goals:
- exposes a pointer to a data structure that is not meant to be shared with the application
- requires a mutex to be used in every process call for the UdpTransport
I think we need to consider alternatives and am willing to spend some time this week to have a conference call to review alternatives.
Thanks,
Jason
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: svn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <
svn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Apr 9, 2006 10:20 AM
Subject: [reSIProcate-commit] COMMIT: resiprocate 6128 moetje: Added STUN client support
To: resiprocate-commit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Project | resiprocate |
New Revision | 6128 |
Committer | moetje (Matthias Moetje) |
Date | 2006-04-09 10:20:40 -0700 (Sun, 09 Apr 2006) |
Log
Added STUN client support
Modified:
_______________________________________________
resiprocate-commit mailing list
resiprocate-commit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-commit