< Previous by Date Date Index Next by Date >
  Thread Index  

[reSIProcate] Fwd: [reSIProcate-commit] COMMIT: resiprocate 6128 moetje: Added STUN client support


I'd like to propose that we reconsider this particular interface change. It has a few implications that I am not sure are consistent with our design goals:

- exposes a pointer to a data structure that is not meant to be shared with the application
- requires a mutex to be used in every process call for the UdpTransport

I think we need to consider alternatives and am willing to spend some time this week to have a conference call to review alternatives.

Thanks,
Jason


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: svn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx < svn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Apr 9, 2006 10:20 AM
Subject: [reSIProcate-commit] COMMIT: resiprocate 6128 moetje: Added STUN client support
To: resiprocate-commit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Projectresiprocate
New Revision6128
Committermoetje (Matthias Moetje)
Date2006-04-09 10:20:40 -0700 (Sun, 09 Apr 2006)

Log

 Added STUN client support


Modified:


_______________________________________________
resiprocate-commit mailing list
resiprocate-commit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-commit