< Previous by Date	Date Index	Next by Date >
< Previous in Thread	Thread Index	Next in Thread >

RE: [reSIProcate] newbie question about REGISTER

From: "Michael Baj" <mbaj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2006 07:51:43 -0600

All,

I have also seen this same problem when using SIPP for local testing. For some reason, the reciprocate stack can not find a matching transport for the message and returns a 503 response. In addition, even if the client is running on a different machine, it must also be running, sourced from port 5060, otherwise I also get the 503 response. It looks like it is using the Via source host and port to determine an appropriprate transport. Is this to spec?

Here is the stack trace:

onUser.cxx:64 | Match!

onState.cxx:47 | Creating new TransactionState: tid=6172221000 [ ServerNonInvite/Trying reliable target=[

V4 0.0.0.0:0 UNKNOWN_TRANSPORT target domain=unspecified connectionId=0 ]]

onState.cxx:1575 | Send to TU: TU: SipDirector size=0 REGISTER sip:192.168.10.55:5060 SIP/2.0

Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.10.70:5075;branch=z9hG4bK6172221000

Max-Forwards: 70

Contact: <sip:6172221000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx:5075>

To: sut <sip:6172221000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx:5060>

From: 6172221000 <sip:6172221000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx:5060>

Call-ID: 1-1097@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

CSeq: 1 REGISTER

Expires: 3600

User-Agent: SIPP

Content-Length: 0

onState.cxx:196 | No matching transaction for SipReq: REGISTER 192.168.10.55:5060 tid=6172221000 cseq=RE

GISTER contact=6172221000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx:5075 / 1 from(tu)

onState.cxx:47 | Creating new TransactionState: tid=6172221000 [ ClientNonInvite/Trying reliable target=[

V4 0.0.0.0:0 UNKNOWN_TRANSPORT target domain=unspecified connectionId=0 ]]

onState.cxx:438 | TransactionState::processClientNonInvite: SipReq: REGISTER 192.168.10.55:5060 tid=6172

221000 cseq=REGISTER contact=6172221000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx:5075 / 1 from(tu)

e.cxx:85 | Adding timer: Timer F tid=6172221000 ms=32000

onState.cxx:1507 | sendToWire with no dns result: tid=6172221000 [ ClientNonInvite/Trying reliable target

=[ V4 0.0.0.0:0 UNKNOWN_TRANSPORT target domain=unspecified connectionId=0 ]]

| DnsResult::lookup sip:192.168.10.55:5070

| Numeric result so return immediately: [ V4 192.168.10.55:5070 UDP target domain=192.168.10.55 connecti

]

onState.cxx:1341 | tid=6172221000 [ ClientNonInvite/Trying reliable target=[ V4 0.0.0.0:0 UNKNOWN_TRANSPO

RT target domain=unspecified connectionId=0 ]] got DNS result: 192.168.10.55 --> [[ V4 192.168.10.55:5070

UDP target domain=192.168.10.55 connectionId=0 ]]

| Returning next dns entry: [ V4 192.168.10.55:5070 UDP target domain=192.168.10.55 connectionId=0 ]

onState.cxx:1384 | Unreliable transport: tid=6172221000 [ ClientNonInvite/Trying unreliable target=[ V4 0

.0.0.0:0 UNKNOWN_TRANSPORT target domain=unspecified connectionId=0 ]]

e.cxx:85 | Adding timer: Timer E1 tid=6172221000 ms=500

lector.cxx:352 | hint provided by app: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.10.70:5075;branch=z9hG4bK6172221000

lector.cxx:740 | findTransport([ V4 192.168.10.70:5075 UDP target domain=unspecified connectionId=0 ])

lector.cxx:788 | Exact interface / Specific port: []

lector.cxx:789 | Any interface / Specific port: [[ V4 0.0.0.0:5060 UDP target domain=unspecified connecti

] -> 0x9749940, [ V4 0.0.0.0:5060 TCP target domain=unspecified connectionId=0 ] -> 0x9749c98]

lector.cxx:790 | Exact interface / Any port: []

lector.cxx:791 | Any interface / Any port: [[ V4 0.0.0.0:5060 UDP target domain=unspecified connectionId=

0 ] -> 0x9749940, [ V4 0.0.0.0:5060 TCP target domain=unspecified connectionId=0 ] -> 0x9749c98]

Selector.cxx:793 | Can't find matching transport [ V4 192.168.10.70:5075 UDP target domain=unspecified co

nnectionId=0 ]

ector.cxx:663 | tid=6172221000 failed to find a transport to [ V4 192.168.10.55:5070 UDP target domain=19

2.168.10.55 connectionId=0 ]

onState.cxx:161 | Found matching transaction for TransportFailure: 6172221000 -> tid=6172221000 [ ClientN

onInvite/Trying unreliable target=[ V4 0.0.0.0:0 UNKNOWN_TRANSPORT target domain=unspecified connectionId

=0 ]]

onState.cxx:438 | TransactionState::processClientNonInvite: TransportFailure: 6172221000

nState.cxx:1274 | Try sending request to a different dns result

| Priming []

nState.cxx:1254 | Ran out of dns entries for 192.168.10.55. Send 503

er::makeResponse(SipReq: REGISTER 192.168.10.55:5060 tid=6172221000 cseq=REGISTER contact=6172221000@192

.168.10.70:5075 / 1 from(tu) code=503 reason=

onState.cxx:1575 | Send to TU: TU: SipDirector size=0 SIP/2.0 503 Service Unavailable

Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.10.70:5075;branch=z9hG4bK6172221000

To: "sut"<sip:6172221000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx:5060>;tag=c9f91735

From: 6172221000 <sip:6172221000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx:5060>

Call-ID: 1-1097@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

CSeq: 1 REGISTER

Warning: 499 mbaj-dev.bridgeport-networks.com "No other DNS entries to try"

Content-Length: 0

From: resiprocate-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:resiprocate-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Hagai Sela (TA)
Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2006 5:44 AM
To: resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [reSIProcate] newbie question about REGISTER

Hi,

I am using reciprocate to develop a softphone, and I have a registration related problem.

The register message’s path is softphone->outbound proxy->server. When the softphone and the outbound proxy are running in different computers everything works fine and I get a 200 OK for the register request, but when they are running on the same computer I get a 503 response, and the register message doesn’t arrive to the outbound proxy.

Am I doing something wrong? Is there any way to fix this?

Thanks,

Hagai Sela

IP Telephony System Architect

t 011.972.9.7457901

f 011.972.9.7457895

c 972.54.3033882

hagai@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Nasdaq: LPSN

Emblaze Building, 22 Zarhin Street, PO Box 2067, Industrial Area, Ra’anana, 43100, Israel www.liveperson.com

This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this on behalf of the addressee you must not use, copy, disclose or take action based on this message or any information herein. If you have received this message in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply email and delete this message. Thank you.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [reSIProcate] newbie question about REGISTER
  - From: Byron Campen

Prev by Date: [reSIProcate] newbie question about REGISTER
Next by Date: Re: [reSIProcate] newbie question about REGISTER
Previous by thread: [reSIProcate] newbie question about REGISTER
Next by thread: Re: [reSIProcate] newbie question about REGISTER
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread