Re: [reSIProcate] sending early offer with 183 provisional

[Daniel Pocock <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Scott Godin wrote:

> Looking at your bug report - you are in state UAS_EarlyOffer - which
> means you received an offer in the invite.  You shouldn't be calling
> provideOffer.  You should be using provideAnswer.
>  

provideAnswer works, if I do:

sis->provideAnswer(mySdp);
sis->provisional(183);

Now I get the early media.  When looking at ServerInviteSession.hxx, I 
had thought that provideAnswer might automatically send a 200, so I 
didn't try this earlier.  Maybe a note is need in 
ServerInviteSession.hxx to suggest using provideAnswer with 183.

>  
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: resiprocate-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >   
>
> [mailto:resiprocate-
>  
>
> > devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Daniel Pocock
> > Sent: Monday, January 30, 2006 11:17 AM
> > To: resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: Re: [reSIProcate] sending early offer with 183 provisional
> >
> >
> > Scott Godin wrote:
> >
> >   
> >
> > > What version are you using?  I'm pretty sure this is fixed already in
> > > the SVN head.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >     
> >
> > I'm using the version from the SVN repository, I checked it out about
> >   
>
> 1
>  
>
> > week ago.  Is this something that has been fixed recently, or am I
> > possibly using the wrong repository?
> >
> >   
> >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: resiprocate-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >       
> > >
> > > [mailto:resiprocate-
> > >
> > >
> > >     
> > >
> > > > devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Daniel Pocock
> > > > Sent: Monday, January 30, 2006 11:03 AM
> > > > To: resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > Subject: [reSIProcate] sending early offer with 183 provisional
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I notice in a previous email from December that there is a known bug
> > > > that complicates the sending of early media (i.e. a 183 Session
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >       
> > >
> > > Progress
> > >
> > >
> > >     
> > >
> > > > response with an SDP offer attached).  ServerInviteSession currently
> > > > bails out with an `assert' if I attempt to call provideOffer with
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >       
> > >
> > > early
> > >
> > >
> > >     
> > >
> > > > media.
> > > >
> > > > Is this issue any closer to being resolved, i.e. is there a
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >       
> > >
> > > workaround,
> > >
> > >
> > >     
> > >
> > > > is someone working on it already or should I consider creating a
> > > >       
> patch
>  
>
> > > > myself?
> > > >
> > > > I've just created a new entry in the bug tracker for it,
> > > > http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/RSP-24
> > > >
> > > > If anyone else is already working on this problem or knows a
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >       
> > >
> > > workaround,
> > >
> > >
> > >     
> > >
> > > > please contact me or the list.
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > >
> > > > Danie
> > > >
> > > >       
> > >
> > > l
> > >

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature