Re: [reSIProcate] INFO being processed using same transaction state asBYE
- From: Alan Hawrylyshen <alan@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 14:05:22 -0700
On Jan 16, 2006, at 11.06, Scott Godin wrote:
Good question - the RFC does seem to indicate that you should be
checking the Send-by parameter and verifying that the Method's match -
although it is not very clear over how mismatches should be handled.
However currently resip only uses the tid for matching - perhaps
one of
the core developers has more info to share on resip's
implementation. :
)
I somehow missed the rest of this thread when I responded.
I think there would be a fairly easy way to 4XX this subsequent
request, but beyond that it would get very expensive (CPU or memory)
to deal with this in an accommodating fashion.
A