Re: [reSIProcate] Contact missing in 180 response...
hi,
1.The client's Dialog is created after the client received a "180
message" from the Proxy. So I think it is correct for the client that
it failed when calling findDialog method after receiving "180 Ring".
2.For the "100 trying " reponse, Contact is not necessary. But for
"180 Ring" message, I think the Contact header is mandatory. So you
should check your proxy.
2005/12/21, John Draper <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> Hi,
>
> When I get a 180 response getting back after I've issued the Invite request,
> I get the following log data returned.
>
> See my notation markers <----(n)
>
> resiprocate/dum/DialogSet.cxx:665 | findDialog:
> 15564cf74ce8b89e@am9obi1kcmFwZXJzLWNvbXB1dGVyLmxvY2Fs-1b464936-7e95afd1c801415ab927598c3dc178b3
> in [] <-----(1)
> resiprocate/dum/DialogSet.cxx:585 | Cannot create a dialog, no Contact
> in 180. <----- (2)
> : DlogSet-onNonDialogCreatingProvisional -
>
> In marker (1) above, it appears findDialog is not finding a dialog...
> is this normal?
>
> In Marker (2) is cannot create a dialog, probably because it has to,
> but the message
> says "no Contact in 180"...
>
> Does this mean the sip proxy is failing to send a "Contact:" header in
> the response?
> Or does this mean that I'm failing to send a properly formed "Contact:"
> header in my
> initial request? If the latter, my Initial request is....
>
> INVITE sip:u218055@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx SIP/2.0
> To: <sip:u218055@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> From: <sip:u354@xxxxxxxxxxxxx:5060>;tag=1b464936
> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
> 192.168.0.2:5060;branch=z9hG4bK-d87543-5d28bbe6117c43a5-1--d87543-;rport
> Call-ID: 15564cf74ce8b89e@am9obi1kcmFwZXJzLWNvbXB1dGVyLmxvY2Fs
> CSeq: 1 INVITE
> Contact: <sip:u354@xxxxxxxxxxx:5060> <-----(3)
> Max-Forwards: 70
> Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE
> Content-Type: application/sdp
> User-Agent: RTC/1.3.5369 (OnInstant/0_0)
> Content-Length: 257
>
> v=0
> o=- 0 0 IN IP4 192.168.0.2
> s=WhitePhone Mac
> c=IN IP4 192.168.0.2
> t=0 0
> m=audio 10976 RTP/AVP 0 8 3 97 101
> a=fmtp:101 0-15
> a=rtpmap:0 pcmu/8000
> a=rtpmap:8 pcma/8000
> a=rtpmap:3 gsm/8000
> a=rtpmap:97 speex/8000
> a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000
>
> Note marker (3) above. That contact field IS there, so how can it be
> missing?
>
> My 100 response is:
>
> SIP/2.0 100 Trying
> To: <sip:u218055@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> From: <sip:u354@xxxxxxxxxxxxx:5060>;tag=1b464936
> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
> 192.168.0.2:5060;branch=z9hG4bK-d87543-5d28bbe6117c43a5-1--d87543-;rport
> Call-ID: 15564cf74ce8b89e@am9obi1kcmFwZXJzLWNvbXB1dGVyLmxvY2Fs
> CSeq: 1 INVITE
> User-Agent: RTC/1.3.5369 (OnInstant/0_0)
> Content-Length: 0
>
> <<< No "Contact:" field in here, is this normal?
>
> I get a few of these....
>
> My 180 response is:
>
> 180 Ringing R002180550267569601414752M000
> To: <sip:u218055@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;tag=7e95afd1c801415ab927598c3dc178b3
> From: <sip:u354@xxxxxxxxxxxxx:5060>;tag=1b464936
> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
> 192.168.0.2:5060;branch=z9hG4bK-d87543-5d28bbe6117c43a5-1--d87543-;rport
> Call-ID: 15564cf74ce8b89e@am9obi1kcmFwZXJzLWNvbXB1dGVyLmxvY2Fs
> CSeq: 1 INVITE
> User-Agent: RTC/1.3
> Content-Length: 0
>
> As you see, my response don't have a "Contact:" field in it... is it
> supposed to have one?
>
> Also, my "gdb" output displays this:
>
> *warning: can't find class named `resip::SipMessage', as given by C++ RTTI
> warning: can't find class named `resip::SipMessage', as given by C++ RTTI
> warning: can't find class named `resip::SipMessage', as given by C++ RTTI
> warning: can't find class named `resip::SipMessage', as given by C++ RTTI
>
> What does this mean? I have that class, why would it say it can't find it?
> I don't get this all the time, only sometimes...
>
> John
> *
> _______________________________________________
> resiprocate-devel mailing list
> resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel
>