Re: [reSIProcate] Interest in a coding party?
On Wed, 2005-11-30 at 13:04 -0500, Scott Lawrence wrote:
> I've been doing some exploring of how the sipXpbx project can
> incorporate some resiprocate technology. Dale Worley and I have done
> some work on incorporating bbridge (a feature we'd like to have done
> for the sipXpbx 3.2 release), and I've also done some very preliminary
> work on using repro as the proxy component. Each of these efforts
> (especially the latter) have suggested some areas we'd like to work
> on.
>
> Pingtel is offering to host (secure space and network connectivity
> for) a coding session on our about the week of February 6th in the
> Boston area (we're open to moving that to a different time if it makes
> it better for people). We're particularly interested in the areas
> above, but other efforts (1.0 release?) are welcome too.
>
> Is there interest? Is that time good? Reply on-list or privately...
I've received a couple of expressions of interest, but not enough yet to
go ahead with. I'd like to hear from people about whether:
- there is interest but more information on goals is needed.
- there is interest but more time is needed to get approvals.
- there is interest but the time is bad (and if so, what would be
better; I'm quite flexible in this regard).
Silence will be taken as total lack of interest under any circumstances,
so if that's you just hit delete and forget it.
--
Scott Lawrence tel:+1-781-938-5306;ext=162 or sip:slawrence@xxxxxxxxxxx
Consulting Engineer - Pingtel Corp. http://www.pingtel.com/
sipXpbx project coordinator - SIPfoundry http://www.sipfoundry.org/sipX