RE: [reSIProcate] Handling of 200 ok response with out Contacts Field
Patel,
This is the 3rd time you've posted this problem. Jason has responded
already with some food for thought, but no conclusions on a final
solution have been made yet.
>From Jason:
>What do people think we should do in this case? I'm not sure what is
the >right thing to do here. Certainly, we should catch the exception
and not >leak any state. If there is no Contact, how can we refresh the
>subscription? I guess we could do something if the expires=0 on the
>subscription.
I suggest that if you need an immediate solution, then you should
implement something in your local copy of resiprocate.
Scott
> -----Original Message-----
> From: resiprocate-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:resiprocate-
> devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Patel Parag
> Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2005 2:06 AM
> To: resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [reSIProcate] Handling of 200 ok response with out Contacts
Field
>
> hi scott,
> I am facing one problem during handling of 200 ok response(with
out
> contacts field) of SUBSCRIBE Request. I try to explain flow of
response
> handling for SUBSCRIBE response.
>
> 1)DialogUsageManager::processResponce()
> 2)DialogSet::dispatch()
> there is Dialog not found so, DUM create new Dialog for
> Subscription
>
> if (dialog == 0)
> {
> dialog = new Dialog(mDum, msg, *this);
> }
>
> but, problem is, response doesn't contain contact field
so
> throw
> exception.
>
> if (response.exists(h_Contacts) &&
> response.header(h_Contacts).size() ==
> 1)
> {
> }
> else
> {
> // control will come here ... and throw
exception.
> }
> please any buddy give me right direction...
>
> According to RFC 3842.. response to SUBSCRIBE may come without
> contacts
> field.
>
> regards,
>
> _______________________________________________
> resiprocate-devel mailing list
> resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel