RE: [reSIProcate] INVITE, dialog and tags
- From: "Alexander Altshuler" <alt@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 23:35:04 +0400
Hi Christian
Sorry, I did not read full trace from original post.
BYE request was constructed in according with rfc3261.
But in your scenario you need to send CANCEL instead of BYE.
Use AppDialogSet::end() instead of ClientInviteSession::end()
Regards,
Alex
-----Original Message-----
From: resiprocate-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:resiprocate-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Christian_Gavin@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Monday, October 24, 2005 7:53 PM
To: resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [reSIProcate] INVITE, dialog and tags
Yes, I had the feeling that 1xx would establish the dialog (early dialog)
and reSIProcate is correct in using the tag from the BYE.
So, would you say in this case the Cisco gateway is wrong to reject the BYE
?
Regards,
Christian
> Hi
>
> Read rfc3261 more closely.
> First INVITE is not request within dialog.
> Dialog is established when you get first 1XX or 2XX response (except
100).
> So you must use tag from 183 response (in your scenario) to construct any
> requests within dialog - re-INVITES, BYE etc.
>
> Regards,
> Alex
_______________________________________________
resiprocate-devel mailing list
resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel