RE: [reSIProcate] On Registration - pls clarify

["Alexander Altshuler" <alt@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi

 

REGISTER without Contact header is fetching of current binding for given AOR.

So server must respond with 200 without contact, you don’t need any update in Location service.

 

10.2.3 Fetching Bindings

A success response to any REGISTER request contains the complete list

of existing bindings, regardless of whether the request contained a

Contact header field. If no Contact header field is present in a

REGISTER request, the list of bindings is left unchanged.

 

 

Regards,

Alex

 

-----Original Message-----
From: resiprocate-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:resiprocate-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Asheesh Joshi
Sent: Monday, October 03, 2005 5:05 PM
To: resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [reSIProcate] On Registration - pls clarify

 

 

Infact I dont see this explicitly stated in RFC 3261 as to what should Registrar do ? Can someone please help ?

 

-thanks

Asheesh

 

---

From: resiprocate-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:resiprocate-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Asheesh Joshi
Sent: Monday, October 03, 2005 6:28 PM
To: resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [reSIProcate] On Registration - pls clarify

Hi all,

I have a very fundamental query.

 

What happens when a first REGISTER arrives from a UA to a Register and it does not

have a Contact header field ?

 

Will it be ok to say ( as per RFC 3261 ) that the Registrar will respond with 200 OK with Contact header field

containing no values ( empty ).   Will or should the Registrar actually create an index into its "Location service"

database with the AOR of the To header and leave it empty ? Or should it simply respond with 200 OK and do

nothing ?

 

Any comments ?

 

 

-regards

Asheesh