Re: [reSIProcate] enum question
On 9/28/05, Nils Ohlmeier <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wednesday 28 September 2005 22:03, Jason Fischl wrote:
> > If UA1 dials tel:+14155551212 the request gets routed to example2.com.
> > If UA1 (or Proxy1 on behalf of UA1) doesn't rewrite the request-uri to
> > be sip:b@xxxxxxxxxxxx then proxy2 will have to determine (perhaps
> > through an enum lookup of its own) that it is responsible for the
> > dialed number? This is more significant if proxy2 is really just an
> > edge proxy and doesn't have direct access to example2.com's location
> > service.
> >
> > What do folks think?
>
> I think routing without changing the ruri does not make too much sence in most
> SIP scenarios. The only exception which I'm aware of is the outbound proxy
> scenario, but in that case the resultion is typically done by the outbound
> proxy.
> I think their should be two options:
> 1.) resolve tel uri's
> 2.) rewrite ruri after tel uri resolution
> Both should be on by default.
>
I think this is correct as well. Will implement this strategy. It is a
very minimal change to current implementation.