RE: [reSIProcate] Call for Vote: resiprocate-users
> VOTE on creation of new SIP Foundry list:
> Proposed scope and charter:
> A mailing list for the discussion of using the reSIProcate SIP stack
> and building applications using the stack, and/or DUM, the dialog
> usage manager library. Any
> discussion not related to the development of the stack internals is
> relevant on this
> list.
>
> [X] Yes, I support the creation of resiprocate-users.
> [ ] No, I DO NOT support the creation of resiprocate-users.
> [ ] Abstain. I have no opinion on this, but wish to register that
> I am not ignoring the process.
>
> Reason (if applicable):
> I think that it could help as topic classifier.
> Some question in the "User List" could trigger a post in the "Devel List" if
> there is a problem to fix or feature to add.
>
> Regards
> Rodrigo
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: resiprocate-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [SMTP:resiprocate-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Alan
> Hawrylyshen
> Sent: Saturday, September 03, 2005 20:37
> To: resiprocate
> Subject: [reSIProcate] Call for Vote: resiprocate-users
>
>
> In the spirit of documenting and formally soliciting opinions, please
> respond to this thread publicly and mark your preference and add any
> comments. In 5 days, I will tally the votes and request a new
> mailing list based on the results, sooner if I get an obvious
> supportive response from a majority of respondents.
>
> Please mark an 'X' in the '[ ]' that matches your opinion.
>
>
> Thanks, Alan
>
>
>
> Alan Hawrylyshen
> reSIProcate Project Administrator
> http://sipfoundry.org/reSIProcate/
> a l a n a t j a s o m i d o t c o m
>
> --------- 8< --- Cut Here ----- 8< ------------------------
> VOTE on creation of new SIP Foundry list:
> Proposed scope and charter:
> A mailing list for the discussion of using the reSIProcate SIP stack
> and building applications using the stack, and/or DUM, the dialog
> usage manager library. Any
> discussion not related to the development of the stack internals is
> relevant on this
> list.
>
> [ ] Yes, I support the creation of resiprocate-users.
> [ ] No, I DO NOT support the creation of resiprocate-users.
> [ ] Abstain. I have no opinion on this, but wish to register that
> I am not ignoring the process.
>
> Reason (if applicable):
>
>
>
> --------- 8< --- Cut Here ----- 8< ------------------------
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> resiprocate-devel mailing list
> resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel