Re: [reSIProcate] resiprocate-users? Is it time? (was: Usingresiprocate ... )
I agree.
On 8/23/05, Scott Godin <slgodin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I think a resip-users group makes sense - it should help separate list
> traffic better.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: resiprocate-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:resiprocate-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Alan
> Hawrylyshen
> Sent: Monday, August 22, 2005 11:46 PM
> To: resiprocate
> Subject: [reSIProcate] resiprocate-users? Is it time? (was:
> Usingresiprocate ... )
>
> Some interesting comments noted in this thread;
>
> The distinction between users and developers of the reSIProcate
> software package has been fairly fuzzy to date. It's clear to me now
> that we are developing a broader base of individuals that might be
> using the stack vs. interested in the internals. As such, how do
> people feel about a user list for reSIProcate? Please drop me a line
> with your feelings on this and I'll ping the SF board / admins to see
> if we can arrange an extra list if demand supports it.
>
> Thanks
>
> Alan Hawrylyshen
>
>
> Alan Hawrylyshen
> reSIProcate Project Administrator
> http://sipfoundry.org/reSIProcate/
> a l a n a t j a s o m i d o t c o m
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> resiprocate-devel mailing list
> resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel
> _______________________________________________
> resiprocate-devel mailing list
> resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel
>