Re: [reSIProcate] The use of #define RESIPROCATE_SUBSYSTEMSubsystem::SIP
On 8/22/05, Scott Godin <slgodin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> You can get away with using Subsystem::SIP in your application.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: resiprocate-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:resiprocate-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of John
> Draper
> Sent: Sunday, August 21, 2005 10:34 PM
> To: resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [reSIProcate] The use of #define
> RESIPROCATE_SUBSYSTEMSubsystem::SIP
>
> Hi,
>
> Since I'm developing a SIPPhone, and the "test" defines a subsystem
> called test....
> and some of these sub-systems are defined in...
> resiprocate/os/Subsystem.cxx...
> Is it a good idea to define my OWN subsystem, much like the "test"
> does, or
> can I just get away sith using
>
> #define RESIPROCATE_SUBSYSTEM Subsystem::SIP
>
You can also sublcass resip::Subsystem and put whatever values you
want that make sense for your application.
Jason