RE: [reSIProcate] directory reorg

["Derek MacDonald" <derek@xxxxxxxx>]

As a follow-up, I didn't notice that repro was under resip; in parallel(as
was done today) seems to be where it will live.

--Derek

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE

This email and any files transmitted with it contains proprietary
information and, unless expressly stated otherwise, all contents and
attachments are confidential. This email is intended for the addressee(s)
only and access by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not an addressee,
any disclosure, distribution, printing or copying of the contents of this
email or its attachments, or any action taken in reliance on it, is
unauthorized and may be unlawful. If you are not an addressee, please inform
the sender immediately and then delete this email and any copies of it.
Thank you for your co-operation.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: resiprocate-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:resiprocate-
> devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Derek MacDonald
> Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2005 5:03 PM
> To: 'david Butcher'; resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [reSIProcate] directory reorg
> 
> We could also have make targets that only built util(prob. including os)
> or
> a library made up of dns + util.
> 
> An advantage to this scheme preserves the resip namespace in include
> paths;
> one would have:
> 
> #include "resip/os/Mutex.hxx"
> #include "resip/util/Data.hxx"
> 
> which is nice and clean.
> 
> I would have no problem changing to this scheme, and I think it teases out
> the necessary components for MSRP development.
> 
> --Derek
> 
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> 
> This email and any files transmitted with it contains proprietary
> information and, unless expressly stated otherwise, all contents and
> attachments are confidential. This email is intended for the addressee(s)
> only and access by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not an
> addressee,
> any disclosure, distribution, printing or copying of the contents of this
> email or its attachments, or any action taken in reliance on it, is
> unauthorized and may be unlawful. If you are not an addressee, please
> inform
> the sender immediately and then delete this email and any copies of it.
> Thank you for your co-operation.
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: resiprocate-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:resiprocate-
> > devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of david Butcher
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2005 4:54 PM
> > To: resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: [reSIProcate] directory reorg
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > We haven't picked at this scab for a while. I would like to propose a
> > directory structure for resiprocate.
> >
> > resip/dns
> > resip/dns/test
> > resip/dum
> > resip/dum/test
> > resip/os
> > resip/os/test
> > resip/repro
> > resip/repro/test
> > resip/sip
> > resip/sip/test
> > resip/util
> > resip/util/test
> >
> > My understanding is that msrp is off in its own repository.
> >
> > Things to notice:
> >  - the stack proper is in repro/sip
> >  - os and util are separated
> >  -- Mutex, Condition, etc. will be in resip/os
> >  -- Data, DataStream, ParseBuffer, etc. are in resip/util
> >  - tests are separated
> >
> > david
> > _______________________________________________
> > resiprocate-devel mailing list
> > resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> resiprocate-devel mailing list
> resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel