RE: [reSIProcate] reSIProcate speed is much slower now

["Andy Agarwal" <Andy@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

I set the logging to "Error". Nothing was printed by the program while
the test ran.

        Log::initialize(Log::Cout, Log::Err, argv[0]);

I also built the stack and test program in Win32-Release mode. Did not
change the reSIP settings. I see that it is set to - Full Optimization
(Ox) and Favor Fast Code (/Oy)



 

-----Original Message-----
From: Fischl jason [mailto:jason.fischl@xxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2005 8:57 AM
To: Andy Agarwal
Cc: jiangjinke@xxxxxxx; resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [reSIProcate] reSIProcate speed is much slower now

Did you build with optimization turned on? Also, is any logging enabled?
What type of logging (i.e. file-based)?

Jason


On 7/21/05, Andy Agarwal <Andy@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Yes, I am running the stack on Win32. Should have mentioned that,
sorry.
> The machine I'm running it on is a 3GHz P4 with 1GB RAM running 
> Windows
> 2003 server
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: resiprocate-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:resiprocate-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
> jiangjinke@xxxxxxx
> Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2005 10:07 PM
> To: resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [reSIProcate] reSIProcate speed is much slower now
> 
> Hi Andy,
> 
> I'm using the rev. 5129 now, and the average (about 10 times) call 
> rate is 340 cps.
> The platform I'm using:
> Redhat EL3,
> P4 CPU 2.40GHz,
> 1G Memory
> 
> I've try the program on another win32 machine:
> 500 calls peformed in 13859 ms, a rate of 36.0776 calls per second.]
> CPU: P4 2.4G
> MEM: 512M
> The performance drops a lot under win32 It seems the problem only 
> exists in the win32 related code.
> 
> 
> Regards
> Jinke Jiang
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Andy Agarwal" <Andy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2005 8:23 AM
> Subject: [reSIProcate] reSIProcate speed is much slower now
> 
> 
> I was using reSIP 0.9.5019 until yesterday. I switched to revision 
> 5096 from the main branch because of a bug in 0.9 where the duplicate 
> transaction ids were being created in my multi-threaded app (see - 
> http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/resiprocate-devel/msg02835.html).
> 
> I was trying to see if there is a performance difference between 0.9 
> and rev. 5096 from the main branch and found a significant change.
> In 0.9 the testSpeed program generates 359 calls per second.
> In rev. 5096 it generates 72 calls per second.
> 
> Can anyone explain the reason behind this huge drop ? I have attached 
> the testSpeed program for those interested.
> 
> thanks,
> andy
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
> --------
> 
> 
> > _______________________________________________
> > resiprocate-devel mailing list
> > resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> resiprocate-devel mailing list
> resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel
> _______________________________________________
> resiprocate-devel mailing list
> resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel
>

Attachment: testSpeed.zip
Description: testSpeed.zip