Re: [reSIProcate] using Resiprocate with STUN
Cullen is right. If the proxy supports received and
rport, you donot need to do any extra processing in
the Contact and Via. I have tested that.
kaiduan
--- Cullen Jennings <fluffy@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Not sure but, I think if you set the Contact, the
> stack should not overwrite
> it with local information. Not sure about the via
> but I don't think it
> matters much because the proxy will ad a received
> from address and use that
> so it does not matter than the via has the wrong
> address.
>
> On 7/1/05 4:32 PM, "Jeff Knighton"
> <jeff.knighton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > I'm trying to add STUN support to my resiprocate
> based UA. I've gotten to
> > the point where my STUN client has returned the
> correct ipaddress/port
> > combination, and I'm trying to get resiprocate to
> use it when it constructs
> > messages. As I've been stepping through the
> debugger as I try to construct
> > and send an INVITE, it appears that the
> transport.cxx inserts the local
> > machine's ip address into the "Via" and "Contact"
> fields. What is the
> > proper way to tell resiprocate about the "new"
> ipaddress and port?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Jeff Knighton
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > resiprocate-devel mailing list
> > resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
>
https://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel
>
> _______________________________________________
> resiprocate-devel mailing list
> resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
https://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com