< Previous by Date	Date Index	Next by Date >
< Previous in Thread	Thread Index	Next in Thread >

Re: Attention Mac OS 10.3 Users ... (was:[reSIProcate] 0.9.0 release candidate tarball)

From: Alan Hawrylyshen <alan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 10:40:30 -0600


On Jun 17, 2005, at 02:04, Nils Ohlmeier wrote:

I'm not on 10.3 any more. But I tested your patch when I was stillon 10.3 andit compiled fine. So I would say: apply it (it compiles on 10.3 and10.4;
dont know about earlier versions).


Thanks Nils!

Robert, can you apply this or do you want me to patch the tip of the0.9.0 branch?


Alan

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Attention Mac OS 10.3 Users ... (was:[reSIProcate] 0.9.0 release candidate tarball)
  - From: Robert Sparks

References:
- [reSIProcate] 0.9.0 release candidate tarball
  - From: Robert Sparks
- Re: [reSIProcate] 0.9.0 release candidate tarball
  - From: Alan Hawrylyshen
- Attention Mac OS 10.3 Users ... (was:[reSIProcate] 0.9.0 release candidate tarball)
  - From: Alan Hawrylyshen
- Re: Attention Mac OS 10.3 Users ... (was:[reSIProcate] 0.9.0 release candidate tarball)
  - From: Nils Ohlmeier

Prev by Date: Re: [reSIProcate] assert under load test (race condition?)
Next by Date: RE: [reSIProcate] on a UAS based on the DUM: Not able to send SDP data Answer in a provisional response
Previous by thread: Re: Attention Mac OS 10.3 Users ... (was:[reSIProcate] 0.9.0 release candidate tarball)
Next by thread: Re: Attention Mac OS 10.3 Users ... (was:[reSIProcate] 0.9.0 release candidate tarball)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread