Re: [reSIProcate] 0.9.0 release candidate tarball
Ok forget my error from below. It was just caused by the fact that the ports
5070 and 5080 were already in use by other applications (maybe that should
not be hardcoded ;) )
Meanwhile I build and ran 'make check' successfull on the following systems:
Gentoo Linux on PPC
Linux version 2.6.9-gentoo-r9 (root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) (gcc version 3.4.1
20040803 (Gentoo Linux 3.4.1-r3, ssp-3.4-2, pie-8.7.6.5)) #1 Tue Dec 21
01:23:44 GMT 2004
Gentoo Linux on x86
Linux version 2.6.11-gentoo-r6 (root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) (gcc version
3.3.5-20050130 (Gentoo Linux 3.3.5.20050130-r1, ssp-3.3.5.20050130-1,
pie-8.7.7.1)) #7 Sun Apr 24 03:37:04 CEST 2005
MacOSX 10.4:
Should this be support for the 0.9.0 release?
Alan's fix in os/Socket.h is missing. Thus the compilation fails with a
conflicting declaration of socklen_t.
And finally it fails in the test directory:
Making all in test
if g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../resiprocate -I../.. -I../..
-I/sw/include -I/Users/lando/resiprocate-0.9.0-4902/contrib/ares
-I/usr/kerberos/include -g -O2 -Wall -Wno-deprecated -MT limpc.o -MD -MP -MF
".deps/limpc.Tpo" -c -o limpc.o limpc.cxx; \
then mv -f ".deps/limpc.Tpo" ".deps/limpc.Po"; else rm -f ".deps/limpc.Tpo";
exit 1; fi
limpc.cxx: In function `bool processStdin(resip::Uri*, bool, bool)':
limpc.cxx:285: error: 'TRUE' was not declared in this scope
limpc.cxx: In function `int myMain(int, char**)':
limpc.cxx:923: error: 'FALSE' was not declared in this scope
limpc.cxx:924: error: 'TRUE' was not declared in this scope
make[3]: *** [limpc.o] Error 1
make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: *** [all] Error 2
make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
Greetings
Nils
On Wednesday 15 June 2005 15:20, Nils Ohlmeier wrote:
> Unfortunately I have the following result:
>
> ====================
> 1 of 40 tests failed
> ====================
>
> cat /proc/version
> Linux version 2.6.10-gentoo-r5 (root@quickstep) (gcc version 3.3.5 (Gentoo
> Linux 3.3.5-r1, ssp-3.3.2-3, pie-8.7.7.1)) #1 Mon Jan 17 14:47:18 CET 2005
>
> I think this is the failed test (what do I have to search for?):
>
> make[3]: Entering directory
> `/local/ohlmeini/resiprocate-0.9.0-4902/resiprocate/test'
> CRIT | 20050615-151000.963 | quickstep | lt-SipTortureTests | RESIP:TEST |
> 16156 | 16384 | SipTortureTests.cxx:939 | Test Driver Starting
> CRIT | 20050615-151000.964 | quickstep | lt-SipTortureTests | RESIP:TEST |
> 16156 | 16384 | SipTortureTests.cxx:23 | 2.1 INVITE Parser Torture Test
> Message
> CRIT | 20050615-151001.055 | quickstep | lt-SipTortureTests | RESIP:TEST |
> 16156 | 16384 | SipTortureTests.cxx:134 | TESTASSERT:
> message->header(ExtensionHeader("NewFangledHeader")).front().value() ==
> "newfangled value more newfangled value"BUGTRAILINGSPACE
> CRIT | 20050615-151001.056 | quickstep | lt-SipTortureTests | RESIP:TEST |
> 16156 | 16384 | SipTortureTests.cxx:136 | SUPRESSED:
> message->exists(h_ContentType)
> CRIT | 20050615-151001.057 | quickstep | lt-SipTortureTests | RESIP:TEST |
> 16156 | 16384 | SipTortureTests.cxx:137 | TODO:Check content type
> CRIT | 20050615-151001.057 | quickstep | lt-SipTortureTests | RESIP:TEST |
> 16156 | 16384 | SipTortureTests.cxx:138 | TASSERT: Section FAILED
>
> I will test on PPC later too.
>
> Greetings
> Nils
>
> On Wednesday 15 June 2005 07:51, Robert Sparks wrote:
> > Please verify this tarball on any platform you can test and send a note
> > to the
> > list where it works.
> >
> > http://www.nostrum.com/~rjsparks/resiprocate-0.9.0-4902.tar.gz
> >
> > make check should end with:
> >
> > ===================
> > All 40 tests passed
> > ===================
> >
> > Unless we stumble across an unexpected blocking issue, this tarball will
> > become the 0.9.0 release.
> >
> > RjS
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > resiprocate-devel mailing list
> > resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel
>
> _______________________________________________
> resiprocate-devel mailing list
> resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel