RE: [reSIProcate] libdum vs libresipdum
In windows it's called dum.lib - so I vote libdum too.
-----Original Message-----
From: resiprocate-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:resiprocate-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Fischl
jason
Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 6:24 PM
To: Adam Roach
Cc: resiprocate
Subject: Re: [reSIProcate] libdum vs libresipdum
vote for libdum - which is what it was originally called anyways.
On 6/6/05, Adam Roach <adam@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I would personally argue that dum is (or should be) separate from resip
> -- more like a peer to repro -- and should consequently be "libdum".
>
> I'm interested to hear other people's ideas on the topic.
>
> /a
>
> Robert Sparks wrote:
>
> > There's an inconsistency between the vocal build and the autotools
> > build for dum.
> > One produces libdum, the other libresipdum.
> >
> > Which should it be?
> >
> > RjS
> >
> >------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >resiprocate-devel mailing list
> >resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >https://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> resiprocate-devel mailing list
> resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel
>
_______________________________________________
resiprocate-devel mailing list
resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel