Re: [reSIProcate] StatelessProxy performance problem
Make sure whatever DNS names you are using actually resolve in DNS
(especially localhost).
RjS
On May 16, 2005, at 11:32 AM, Cullen Jennings wrote:
not sure what is going wrong here but it should handle way more than
3cps - if I made a build of the repro proxy for windows, could you do
any performance testing on it and see how that goes?
On 5/16/05 4:43 AM, "Moshe Matitya" <moshe.matitya@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I am running the StatelessProxy application, which is included in the
reSIProcate distribution, on Windows XP SP2 with a Pentium 4
processor. It is configured to open only UDP ports. I set up a load
test in which every call session consists of the following four
messages: INVITE, 180, 200, ACK. The scenario is as follows:
reSIProcate
. Stateless .
. Proxy .
. .
. .
Phone Phone
A B
| | |
| INVITE F1 | INVITE F1 |
|--------------->|--------------->|
| 180 Ringing F8 | 180 Ringing F8 |
|<---------------|<---------------|
| 200 OK F11 | 200 OK F11 |
|<---------------|<---------------|
| ACK F12 | ACK F12 |
|--------------->|--------------->|
| |
What I've found is that the Stateless Proxy cannot handle any more
than 3 calls/sec.
I presume that I'm doing something wrong, since the reSIProcate
Project page [<http://www.sipfoundry.org/reSIProcate/>] states that
reSIProcate provides "fast performance: > ~500 transactions per
second on an Intel(TM) P4".
Is the StatelessProxy application supposed to handle throughput on
this scale? If it is, then what should I be doing to boost the
performance up to the expected levels?
Thanks,
Moshe
_______________________________________________
resiprocate-devel mailing list
resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel
_______________________________________________
resiprocate-devel mailing list
resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel