< Previous by Date Date Index Next by Date >
< Previous in Thread Thread Index Next in Thread >

Re: [reSIProcate] StatelessProxy performance problem


Make sure whatever DNS names you are using actually resolve in DNS
(especially localhost).

RjS

On May 16, 2005, at 11:32 AM, Cullen Jennings wrote:


not sure what is going wrong here but it should handle way more than 3cps - if I made a build of the repro proxy for windows, could you do any performance testing on it and see how that goes?


 On 5/16/05 4:43 AM, "Moshe Matitya" <moshe.matitya@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I am running the StatelessProxy application, which is included in the reSIProcate distribution, on Windows XP SP2 with a Pentium 4 processor.  It is configured to open only UDP ports.  I set up a load test in which every call session consists of the following four messages:  INVITE, 180, 200, ACK.  The scenario is as follows:

                     reSIProcate
                    .  Stateless  .
                  .      Proxy      .
                .                      .
              .                          .
        Phone                             Phone
          A                                 B
          |                |                |
          |    INVITE F1   |    INVITE F1   |
          |--------------->|--------------->|
          | 180 Ringing F8 | 180 Ringing F8 |
          |<---------------|<---------------|
          |    200 OK F11  |    200 OK F11  |
          |<---------------|<---------------|
          |     ACK F12    |     ACK F12    |
          |--------------->|--------------->|
          |                                 |

What I've found is that the Stateless Proxy cannot handle any more than 3 calls/sec.

I presume that I'm doing something wrong, since the reSIProcate Project page [<http://www.sipfoundry.org/reSIProcate/>] states that reSIProcate provides "fast performance: > ~500 transactions per second on an Intel(TM) P4".

Is the StatelessProxy application supposed to handle throughput on this scale?  If it is, then what should I be doing to boost the performance up to the expected levels?

Thanks,

Moshe

_______________________________________________
 resiprocate-devel mailing list
 resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
 https://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel

 _______________________________________________
resiprocate-devel mailing list
resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel