< Previous by Date	Date Index	Next by Date >
< Previous in Thread	Thread Index	Next in Thread >

Re: [reSIProcate] Negative nonce value

From: Fischl jason <jason.fischl@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 17:07:51 -0700

On 4/25/05, Cullen Jennings <fluffy@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>  
>  Yah, I think we need to rethink how we generate the nonce - having them be
> this predictable might have other issues too. 
> 

It isn't predictable. It just incorporates a timestamp in order to
make it possible for it to expire.

References:
- [reSIProcate] Negative nonce value
  - From: alt
- Re: [reSIProcate] Negative nonce value
  - From: Cullen Jennings

Prev by Date: Re: [reSIProcate] the role of <sys/types.h> in resiprocate
Next by Date: [reSIProcate] Dazheng Wang??
Previous by thread: Re: [reSIProcate] Negative nonce value
Next by thread: RE: [reSIProcate] Negative nonce value
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread