[reSIProcate] DUM: Cancel/End not working
I am resending this. The last email didn't post to the list for some reason (I randomly get "moderator approval required" anyone know why?)
PM
Begin forwarded message:
From: "Prasad Mahendra" <prasad.mahendra@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: April 8, 2005 12:48:23 PM PDT
To: "Scott Godin" <slgodin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: DUM Cancel
ReSIP Team,
I updated to head revision from svn (rev 4324). The behavior when I try to CANCEL an invite -- before the session has been established -- is the same (I see a SIP/2.0 481 Call/Transaction Does Not Exist in the logs). I have reproduced the log below.
To test if the dialog still exists I made the callee (UA2) answer (send a 200OK). But when the callee answers (sends the 200OK) DUM throws away the 200OK as a stray response (logs reproduced below).
So it looks like DUM considers the call CANCELled even though there was no cancel sent over-the-wire to the callee.
PM.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Log entries after CANCEL / dum->end( ... ) <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
DEBUG | 20050408-123805.382 | SIPPAPI | RESIP:DUM | 1056 | DialogUsageManager.cxx:1502 | Looking for dialogSet: 3e0cac02535b0838@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx in map:
DEBUG | 20050408-123805.382 | SIPPAPI | RESIP:DUM | 1056 | DialogUsageManager.cxx:1503 | [3e0cac02535b0838@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -> 05012130, bf6f454eb06e3d53@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -> 04FE48C8]
DEBUG | 20050408-123805.382 | SIPPAPI | RESIP:DUM | 1056 | DialogUsageManager.cxx:1502 | Looking for dialogSet: 3e0cac02535b0838@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx in map:
DEBUG | 20050408-123805.382 | SIPPAPI | RESIP:DUM | 1056 | DialogUsageManager.cxx:1503 | [3e0cac02535b0838@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -> 05012130, bf6f454eb06e3d53@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -> 04FE48C8]
DEBUG | 20050408-123805.382 | SIPPAPI | RESIP:DUM | 1056 | DialogUsageManager.cxx:619 | SEND: CANCEL sip:17476694702@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:5060 SIP/2.0
To: <sip:17476694702@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:5060>
From: <sip:17475553001@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;tag=ed4d1318
Via: SIP/2.0/ ;branch=z9hG4bK-d87543-7f37e73c5d55b124-1--d87543-;rport
Call-ID: 3e0cac02535b0838@RnVqaXRzdS1MYXB0b3A.
CSeq: 1 CANCEL
Content-Length: 0
DEBUG | 20050408-123805.382 | SIPPAPI | RESIP:DUM | 1056 | DialogId.cxx:50 | DialogId::DialogId: 3e0cac02535b0838@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx-
DEBUG | 20050408-123805.382 | SIPPAPI | RESIP:DUM | 1056 | DialogUsageManager.cxx:1502 | Looking for dialogSet: 3e0cac02535b0838@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx in map:
DEBUG | 20050408-123805.382 | SIPPAPI | RESIP:DUM | 1056 | DialogUsageManager.cxx:1503 | [3e0cac02535b0838@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -> 05012130, bf6f454eb06e3d53@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -> 04FE48C8]
DEBUG | 20050408-123805.382 | SIPPAPI | RESIP:DUM | 1056 | DialogSet.cxx:652 | findDialog: 3e0cac02535b0838@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx- in []
DEBUG | 20050408-123805.382 | SIPPAPI | RESIP:DUM | 1056 | DialogUsageManager.cxx:667 | Using outbound proxy
DEBUG | 20050408-123805.492 | SIPPAPI | RESIP:TRANSPORT | 3692 | UdpTransport.cxx:166 | Scanner rejecting datagram as unparsable / fragmented from [ V4 198.65.166.131:5060 UDP received on: Transport: [ V4 192.168.15.100:5060 UDP connectionId=0 ] on 192.168.15.100 connectionId=0 ]
DEBUG | 20050408-123805.492 | SIPPAPI | RESIP:TRANSPORT | 3692 | UdpTransport.cxx:167 |
STACK | 20050408-123805.492 | SIPPAPI | RESIP:TRANSACTION | 3692 | TransactionState.cxx:195 | No matching transaction for SipReq: CANCEL 17476694702@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:5060 tid=7f37e73c5d55b124 cseq=CANCEL / 1 from(tu)
INFO | 20050408-123805.492 | SIPPAPI | RESIP:TRANSACTION | 3692 | TransactionState.cxx:301 | No matching INVITE for incoming (from TU) CANCEL to uac
DEBUG | 20050408-123805.492 | SIPPAPI | RESIP | 3692 | Helper.cxx:275 | Helper::makeResponse(SipReq: CANCEL 17476694702@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:5060 tid=7f37e73c5d55b124 cseq=CANCEL / 1 from(tu) code=481 reason=
STACK | 20050408-123805.492 | SIPPAPI | RESIP:TRANSACTION | 3692 | TransactionState.cxx:1524 | Send to TU: SIP/2.0 481 Call/Transaction Does Not Exist
To: <sip:17476694702@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:5060>;tag=d168b943
From: <sip:17475553001@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;tag=ed4d1318
Via: SIP/2.0/ ;branch=z9hG4bK-d87543-7f37e73c5d55b124-1--d87543-;rport
Call-ID: 3e0cac02535b0838@RnVqaXRzdS1MYXB0b3A.
CSeq: 1 CANCEL
Content-Length: 0
INFO | 20050408-123805.492 | SIPPAPI | RESIP:DUM | 3692 | DialogUsageManager.cxx:836 | Got: DestroyDialogSet 3e0cac02535b0838@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
DEBUG | 20050408-123805.492 | SIPPAPI | RESIP:DUM | 3692 | DialogSet.cxx:124 | ********** DialogSet::~DialogSet: 3e0cac02535b0838@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx*************
DEBUG | 20050408-123805.492 | SIPPAPI | RESIP:DUM | 3692 | DialogUsageManager.cxx:1533 | ************* Removing DialogSet ***************
DEBUG | 20050408-123805.492 | SIPPAPI | RESIP:DUM | 3692 | DialogUsageManager.cxx:1534 | Before: [3e0cac02535b0838@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -> 05012130, bf6f454eb06e3d53@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -> 04FE48C8]
DEBUG | 20050408-123805.492 | SIPPAPI | RESIP:DUM | 3692 | DialogUsageManager.cxx:1536 | After: [bf6f454eb06e3d53@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -> 04FE48C8]
STACK | 20050408-123805.492 | SIPPAPI | RESIP:TEST | 3692 | Handled.cxx:21 | &&&&&& ~Handled 6this(04FEC7E0) 04FBCF78
DEBUG | 20050408-123805.492 | SIPPAPI | RESIP:DUM | 3692 | HandleManager.cxx:81 | Waiting for usages to be deleted (2)
INFO | 20050408-123805.522 | SIPPAPI | RESIP:DUM | 3692 | DialogUsageManager.cxx:836 | Got: StatisticsMessage
WARNING | 20050408-123805.522 | SIPPAPI | RESIP:STATS | 3692 | StatisticsMessage.cxx:152 | RESIP:DUM
TU summary: 1 TRANSPORT 0 TRANSACTION 1 CLIENTTX 1 SERVERTX 0 TIMERS 1
Transaction summary: reqi 1 reqo 5 rspi 7 rspo 1
Details: INVi 0/S0/F0 INVo 2/S1/F0 ACKi 0 ACKo 1 BYEi 1/S1/F0 BYEo 0/S0/F0 CANi 0/S1/F0 CANo 0/S0/F0 MSGi 0/S0/F0 MSGo 0/S0/F0 OPTi 0/S0/F0 OPTo 0/S0/F0 REGi 0/S0/F0 REGo 2/S1/F1 PUBi 0/S0/F0 PUBo 0/S0/F0 SUBi 0/S0/F0 SUBo 0/S0/F0 NOTi 0/S0/F0 NOTo 0/S0/F0
Retransmissions: INVx 0 BYEx 0 CANx 0 MSGx 0 OPTx 0 REGx 0 finx 0 nonx 0 PUBx 0 SUBx 0 NOTx 0
DEBUG | 20050408-123805.522 | SIPPAPI | RESIP | 3692 | SipStack.cxx:396 | RECV: SipResp: 481 tid=7f37e73c5d55b124 cseq=CANCEL / 1 from(wire)
INFO | 20050408-123805.522 | SIPPAPI | RESIP:DUM | 3692 | DialogUsageManager.cxx:836 | Got: SipResp: 481 tid=7f37e73c5d55b124 cseq=CANCEL / 1 from(wire)
DEBUG | 20050408-123805.522 | SIPPAPI | RESIP:DUM | 3692 | DialogUsageManager.cxx:841 | DialogUsageManager::process: SipResp: 481 tid=7f37e73c5d55b124 cseq=CANCEL / 1 from(wire)
DEBUG | 20050408-123805.522 | SIPPAPI | RESIP:DUM | 3692 | DialogUsageManager.cxx:1389 | DialogUsageManager::processResponse: SIP/2.0 481 Call/Transaction Does Not Exist
To: <sip:17476694702@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:5060>;tag=d168b943
From: <sip:17475553001@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;tag=ed4d1318
Via: SIP/2.0/ ;branch=z9hG4bK-d87543-7f37e73c5d55b124-1--d87543-;rport
Call-ID: 3e0cac02535b0838@RnVqaXRzdS1MYXB0b3A.
CSeq: 1 CANCEL
Content-Length: 0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> log entries for 200OK after CANCEL / dum->end( ... ) <<<<<<<<<<
DEBUG | 20050408-123820.184 | SIPPAPI | RESIP:DUM | 3692 | DialogUsageManager.cxx:1502 | Looking for dialogSet: 3e0cac02535b0838@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx in map:
DEBUG | 20050408-123820.184 | SIPPAPI | RESIP:DUM | 3692 | DialogUsageManager.cxx:1503 | [bf6f454eb06e3d53@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -> 04FE48C8]
INFO | 20050408-123820.184 | SIPPAPI | RESIP:DUM | 3692 | DialogUsageManager.cxx:1409 | Throwing away stray response: SipResp: 200 tid=bf31046df90d6c66 cseq=INVITE contact=17476694702@xxxxxxxxxxxx:2517 / 1 from(wire)
DEBUG | 20050408-123820.794 | SIPPAPI | RESIP:TRANSPORT | 3692 | UdpTransport.cxx:166 | Scanner rejecting datagram as unparsable / fragmented from [ V4 198.65.166.131:5060 UDP received on: Transport: [ V4 192.168.15.100:5060 UDP connectionId=0 ] on 192.168.15.100 connectionId=0 ]
DEBUG | 20050408-123820.794 | SIPPAPI | RESIP:TRANSPORT | 3692 | UdpTransport.cxx:167 |
DEBUG | 20050408-123822.166 | SIPPAPI | RESIP:TRANSPORT | 3692 | Transport.cxx:209 | incoming from: [ V4 198.65.166.131:5060 UDP received on: Transport: [ V4 192.168.15.100:5060 UDP connectionId=0 ] on 192.168.15.100 connectionId=0 ]
STACK | 20050408-123822.166 | SIPPAPI | RESIP:TRANSPORT | 3692 | Transport.cxx:210 |
<x-tad-bigger>----- Original Message -----</x-tad-bigger>
<x-tad-bigger> </x-tad-bigger><x-tad-bigger>From:</x-tad-bigger><x-tad-bigger> </x-tad-bigger><x-tad-bigger>Scott Godin</x-tad-bigger><x-tad-bigger> </x-tad-bigger>
<x-tad-bigger>To:</x-tad-bigger><x-tad-bigger> </x-tad-bigger><x-tad-bigger>'prasad mahendra'</x-tad-bigger><x-tad-bigger> </x-tad-bigger>
<x-tad-bigger>Cc:</x-tad-bigger><x-tad-bigger> </x-tad-bigger><x-tad-bigger>resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx</x-tad-bigger><x-tad-bigger> </x-tad-bigger>
<x-tad-bigger>Sent:</x-tad-bigger><x-tad-bigger> Thursday, April 07, 2005 6:53 PM</x-tad-bigger>
<x-tad-bigger>Subject:</x-tad-bigger><x-tad-bigger> RE: DUM Cancel</x-tad-bigger>
<x-tad-bigger>You seem to be using an older version. The latest DialogUsageManager does not contain a cancel() method - it was renamed to end(). I'm not sure if you will get the same problem or not - but it's best to see if it still happens with the latest stuff before we try to debug.</x-tad-bigger>
<x-tad-bigger> </x-tad-bigger>
<x-tad-bigger>From:</x-tad-bigger><x-tad-bigger> prasad mahendra [mailto:prasad@xxxxxxxxxxxx]</x-tad-bigger>
<x-tad-bigger> </x-tad-bigger><x-tad-bigger>Sent:</x-tad-bigger><x-tad-bigger> Thursday, April 07, 2005 8:59 PM</x-tad-bigger>
<x-tad-bigger>To:</x-tad-bigger><x-tad-bigger> Scott Godin</x-tad-bigger>
<x-tad-bigger>Cc:</x-tad-bigger><x-tad-bigger> </x-tad-bigger><x-tad-bigger>resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx</x-tad-bigger>
<x-tad-bigger>Subject:</x-tad-bigger><x-tad-bigger> DUM Cancel</x-tad-bigger>
Resip Team,
I am trying to cancel an INVITE before a dialog has been established. That is
UA ---> INVITE ---> UA2
UA <-- 100 <-------- UA2/Proxy
UA <-- 180 <------- UA2/Proxy
I did the following:
dum->cancel( dialogSetId ).
Where the dialogSetId is from the INVITE I am trying to cancel. This does not work. Is this the right way to do it? In the logs I see the CANCEL being prepared and then the dialog set being removed. Then the CANCEL results in a "481" call/txn does not exist -- almost as if these things are being done out of sequence?
<x-tad-bigger>DEBUG | 20050407-175728.520 | SIPPAPI | RESIP:DUM | 688 | DialogId.cxx:50 | DialogId::DialogId: </x-tad-bigger><x-tad-bigger>3e27013a696a5d7f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx</x-tad-bigger><x-tad-bigger>-</x-tad-bigger>
<x-tad-bigger> DEBUG | 20050407-175728.520 | SIPPAPI | RESIP:DUM | 688 | DialogUsageManager.cxx:1308 | Looking for dialogSet: </x-tad-bigger><x-tad-bigger>3e27013a696a5d7f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx</x-tad-bigger><x-tad-bigger> in map:</x-tad-bigger>
<x-tad-bigger> DEBUG | 20050407-175728.520 | SIPPAPI | RESIP:DUM | 688 | DialogUsageManager.cxx:1309 | [3e27013a696a5d7f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -> 04FEF1F8, </x-tad-bigger><x-tad-bigger>90526c5de117164e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx</x-tad-bigger><x-tad-bigger> -> 04FE3D80]</x-tad-bigger>
<x-tad-bigger> DEBUG | 20050407-175728.520 | SIPPAPI | RESIP:DUM | 688 | DialogUsageManager.cxx:525 | Using outbound proxy</x-tad-bigger>
<x-tad-bigger> DEBUG | 20050407-175728.520 | SIPPAPI | RESIP:DUM | 688 | DialogSet.cxx:112 | ********** DialogSet::~DialogSet: </x-tad-bigger><x-tad-bigger>3e27013a696a5d7f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx</x-tad-bigger><x-tad-bigger>*************</x-tad-bigger>
<x-tad-bigger> DEBUG | 20050407-175728.520 | SIPPAPI | RESIP:DUM | 688 | DialogUsageManager.cxx:1339 | ************* Removing DialogSet ***************</x-tad-bigger>
<x-tad-bigger> DEBUG | 20050407-175728.520 | SIPPAPI | RESIP:DUM | 688 | DialogUsageManager.cxx:1340 | Before: [3e27013a696a5d7f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -> 04FEF1F8, </x-tad-bigger><x-tad-bigger>90526c5de117164e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx</x-tad-bigger><x-tad-bigger> -> 04FE3D80]</x-tad-bigger>
<x-tad-bigger> DEBUG | 20050407-175728.520 | SIPPAPI | RESIP:DUM | 688 | DialogUsageManager.cxx:1342 | After: [90526c5de117164e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -> 04FE3D80]</x-tad-bigger>
<x-tad-bigger> STACK | 20050407-175728.520 | SIPPAPI | RESIP:TEST | 688 | Handled.cxx:21 | &&&&&& ~Handled 6this(04FE7430) 04FB79E0</x-tad-bigger>
<x-tad-bigger> DEBUG | 20050407-175728.520 | SIPPAPI | RESIP:DUM | 688 | HandleManager.cxx:70 | Waiting for usages to be deleted (2)</x-tad-bigger>
<x-tad-bigger> STACK | 20050407-175728.520 | SIPPAPI | RESIP:TRANSACTION | 2900 | TransactionState.cxx:183 | No matching transaction for SipReq: CANCEL </x-tad-bigger><x-tad-bigger>17476694702@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:5060</x-tad-bigger><x-tad-bigger> tid=48363d1607463f6c cseq=CANCEL / 1 from(tu)</x-tad-bigger>
<x-tad-bigger> INFO | 20050407-175728.520 | SIPPAPI | RESIP:TRANSACTION | 2900 | TransactionState.cxx:265 | No matching INVITE for incoming (from TU) CANCEL to uac</x-tad-bigger>
<x-tad-bigger> DEBUG | 20050407-175728.520 | SIPPAPI | RESIP | 2900 | Helper.cxx:272 | Helper::makeResponse(SipReq: CANCEL </x-tad-bigger><x-tad-bigger>17476694702@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:5060</x-tad-bigger><x-tad-bigger> tid=48363d1607463f6c cseq=CANCEL / 1 from(tu) code=481 reason=</x-tad-bigger>
<x-tad-bigger> STACK | 20050407-175728.520 | SIPPAPI | RESIP:TRANSACTION | 2900 | TransactionState.cxx:1485 | Send to TU: SIP/2.0 481 Call/Transaction Does Not Exist</x-tad-bigger>
<x-tad-bigger>To: <sip:17476694702@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:5060>;tag=78550b6b</x-tad-bigger>
<x-tad-bigger>From: <sip:17475553001@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:5060>;tag=6f54ca68</x-tad-bigger>
<x-tad-bigger>Via: SIP/2.0/ ;branch=z9hG4bK-d87543-48363d1607463f6c-1--d87543-;rport</x-tad-bigger>
<x-tad-bigger>Call-ID: </x-tad-bigger><x-tad-bigger>3e27013a696a5d7f@RnVqaXRzdS1MYXB0b3A</x-tad-bigger><x-tad-bigger>.</x-tad-bigger>
<x-tad-bigger>CSeq: 1 CANCEL</x-tad-bigger>
<x-tad-bigger>Content-Length: 0</x-tad-bigger>
<x-tad-bigger> </x-tad-bigger> <x-tad-bigger> </x-tad-bigger>
<x-tad-bigger>PM</x-tad-bigger>
<x-tad-bigger> </x-tad-bigger>
On Apr 5, 2005, at 4:46 PM, Scott Godin wrote:
You need to add REFER as a supported Method to your MasterProfile/Profile.
From: Prasad Mahendra [mailto:prasad.mahendra@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2005 5:34 PM
To: prasad mahendra; Scott Godin; engineering@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: REFER (More Info)
I see a "Received an unsupported method method: SipReq: REFER ...." and a few lines later "Failed RequestURI validation REFER ....". Log file reproduced below.
PM/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
DEBUG | 20050405-142700.658 | SIPPAPI | RESIP | 2896 | SipStack.cxx:301 | RECV: SipReq: REFER 17475553001@xxxxxxxxxxxx:15060 tid=146c.f1e5b312.0 cseq=REFER contact=17475553001@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx / 2 from(wire)
INFO | 20050405-142700.658 | SIPPAPI | RESIP:DUM | 2896 | DialogUsageManager.cxx:663 | Got: SipReq: REFER 17475553001@xxxxxxxxxxxx:15060 tid=146c.f1e5b312.0 cseq=REFER contact=17475553001@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx / 2 from(wire)
DEBUG | 20050405-142700.658 | SIPPAPI | RESIP:DUM | 2896 | DialogUsageManager.cxx:668 | DialogUsageManager::process: SipReq: REFER 17475553001@xxxxxxxxxxxx:15060 tid=146c.f1e5b312.0 cseq=REFER contact=17475553001@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx / 2 from(wire)
INFO | 20050405-142700.658 | SIPPAPI | RESIP:DUM | 2896 | DialogUsageManager.cxx:865 | Received an unsupported method: SipReq: REFER 17475553001@xxxxxxxxxxxx:15060 tid=146c.f1e5b312.0 cseq=REFER contact=17475553001@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx / 2 from(wire)
DEBUG | 20050405-142700.658 | SIPPAPI | RESIP | 2896 | Helper.cxx:272 | Helper::makeResponse(SipReq: REFER 17475553001@xxxxxxxxxxxx:15060 tid=146c.f1e5b312.0 cseq=REFER contact=17475553001@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx / 2 from(wire) code=405 reason=
DEBUG | 20050405-142700.658 | SIPPAPI | RESIP | 2896 | SipStack.cxx:189 | SEND: SipResp: 405 tid=146c.f1e5b312.0 cseq=REFER / 2 from(tu)
DEBUG | 20050405-142700.658 | SIPPAPI | RESIP:DUM | 2896 | DialogUsageManager.cxx:673 | Failed RequestURI validation REFER sip:17475553001@xxxxxxxxxxxx:15060 SIP/2.0
To: <sip:17475553001@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;tag=c61bd952
From: <sip:SIPPHONE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;tag=9494753081297.fifouacctd>;tag=db7c9c61357a18efc76e603ec3af96da-5bc6
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 198.65.166.131;branch=z9hG4bK146c.f1e5b312.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 198.65.166.131;branch=z9hG4bK146c.e1e5b312.0
Call-ID: 9494753081297
CSeq: 2 REFER
Record-Route: <sip:17475553001@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx;ftag=db7c9c61357a18efc76e603ec3af96da-5bc6;lr=on>
Contact: <sip:17475553001@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;nat=yes>
Max-Forwards: 10
User-Agent: Sip EXpress router(0.8.14-2 (i386/linux))
Refer-To: sip:411@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Referred-By: <sip:SIPPHONE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Length: 0
----- Original Message -----
From: prasad mahendra
To: Scott Godin
Cc: resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2005 2:22 PM
Subject: [reSIProcate] REFER
Resip Team,
Does the resip stack support the REFER method? When I send a REFER to the resip stack it replies with a 405 method not understood/supported.
PM
On Mar 28, 2005, at 4:31 PM, Scott Godin wrote:
Yes - I did that at the same time.
-----Original Message-----
From: Mariano Stokle [mailto:mstokle@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, March 28, 2005 4:46 PM
To: Scott Godin
Cc: jason@xxxxxx; resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Dennis Dupont
Subject: Re: [reSIProcate] Re: Building problem with resiprocate 0.5.0
BTW, the abstract method is need to be implemented is:
onRequestRetry from ClientRegistrationHandle class. I implemented an
empty method.
Regards,
On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 12:34:01 -0500, Scott Godin <slgodin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
I've committed this fix - thanks.
-----Original Message-----
From: Mariano Stokle [mailto:mstokle@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2005 5:31 PM
To: jason@xxxxxx
Cc: resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Dennis Dupont
Subject: Re: [reSIProcate] Re: Building problem with resiprocate 0.5.0
Hi again,
I was doing some research and got the answer. Here is the diff file:
440c440
< auto_ptr<AppDialogSetFactory> uac_dsf(new testAppDialogSetFactory);
---
auto_ptr<testAppDialogSetFactory> uac_dsf(new
testAppDialogSetFactory);
482c482
< auto_ptr<AppDialogSetFactory> uas_dsf(new testAppDialogSetFactory);
---
auto_ptr<testAppDialogSetFactory> uas_dsf(new
testAppDialogSetFactory);
Regards,
On Sun, 27 Mar 2005 18:12:00 -0300, Mariano Stokle <mstokle@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Hi,
me again. Thanks for your comments. I finally could build both
libraries, resiprocate and dum. Test applications also worked. I am
analysing now BasicCall.cxx. When I trie to compile, I found some
errors with abstract functions I solved in TestUac and TestUas
classes, but I could not figured out about this:
BasicCall.cxx:428: error: no matching function for call to `
std::auto_ptr<resip::AppDialogSetFactory>::auto_ptr(
std::auto_ptr<resip::AppDialogSetFactory>)'
/usr/include/g++/memory:334: error: candidates are:
std::auto_ptr<_Tp>::auto_ptr(std::auto_ptr_ref<_Tp>) [with _Tp =
resip::AppDialogSetFactory]
/usr/include/g++/memory:204: error:
std::auto_ptr<_Tp>::auto_ptr(std::auto_ptr<_Tp1>&) [with _Tp1 =
resip::AppDialogSetFactory, _Tp = resip::AppDialogSetFactory]
/usr/include/g++/memory:192: error:
std::auto_ptr<_Tp>::auto_ptr(std::auto_ptr<_Tp>&) [with _Tp =
resip::AppDialogSetFactory]
BasicCall.cxx:428: error: initializing argument 1 of `void
resip::DialogUsageManager::setAppDialogSetFactory(std::auto_ptr<resip::AppDi
alogSetFactory>)
' from result of `std::auto_ptr<_Tp>::operator std::auto_ptr<_Tp1>()
[with
_Tp1 = resip::AppDialogSetFactory, _Tp = testAppDialogSetFactory]'
I am not an expert about auto_ptr, so I am askin for S.O.S. here. Any
one has introduced any changes in the code to make it work?
Regards,
Mariano
On Fri, 25 Mar 2005 08:33:37 -0800, Fischl jason
<jason.fischl@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Hi all,
I think I inadvertently didn't reply my answer to the main list. The
autotools build system is currently broken. I recommend that you use
the default build system which can be used by just typing make. Have a
look at sip/build/Makefile.conf if you want to customize the build
(e.g. build shared libraries, enable IPV6, SSL, DTLS, etc.)
The problem you are seeing occurs because gperf is not installed on
your system. After installing gperf, delete the file MethodHash.cxx
and everything will be ok. Alternatively, delete MethodHash.cxx and
rerun svn update. The build should be fine after that.
If somebody knows how to hack the Makefile to solve this problem, it
would be great. The problem occurs because svn timestamps the files to
the time of the checkout instead of the time of the checkin
(differently from cvs). As a result, make decides that it needs to
rebuild MethodHash.cxx from MethodHash.gperf. If gperf doesn't exist,
it produces an empty file.
jason
On Fri, 25 Mar 2005 07:23:05 -0600, Dennis Dupont
<ddupont@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Mariano
I was seeing the same problems. I started over yesterday (3/24)
with
a
fresh copy
from svn. This time I did *not* use autotools, I just ran make. I
was
able to build
libresiprocate.a and libdum.a that way (using make -k). However,
none
of the test
programs would build. I am getting the following link error:
../../build/../resiprocate/obj.debug.Linux.i686/libresiprocate.a(MethodT
ypes.o)(.text+0x78): In function `resip::getMethodType(char const*,
int)':
/home/ddupont/devel/resiprocate-050319/main/sip/resiprocate/MethodTypes.
cxx:62: undefined reference to `resip::MethodHash::in_word_set(char
const*, unsigned)'
Dennis Dupont
Senior Systems Architect
Intelemedia Communications, Inc.
-----Original Message-----
From: Mariano Stokle [mailto:mstokle@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2005 7:16 PM
To: resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [reSIProcate] Re: Building problem with resiprocate 0.5.0
I solved that rpoblem forcing to rebuild ARES. Now I found another:
There is no relue defined to build target "Dialog.cxx" necessary for
"Dialog.lo"
Anyone with same problem?
On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 18:45:04 -0300, Mariano Stokle
<mstokle@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Hi,
I just updated resiprocate using svn to Revision 4045. I
followed the regular procedure to build using autotools: at sip:
sh use-autotools.sh
sh autogen.sh
and then at sip/compile:
../configure -C --enable-shared --enable-ipv6
--enable-data-local-size=16 --disable-elog
then:
make
but I got an error in AresDns.cxx
../../resiprocate/AresDns.cxx:12:2: #error Must have ARES
I did not have this problem before..Any one had this problem?
--
Mariano Stokle
SIP Rules
--
Mariano Stokle
SIP Rules
_______________________________________________
resiprocate-devel mailing list
resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel
--
Mariano Stokle
SIP Rules
--
Mariano Stokle
SIP Rules
_______________________________________________
resiprocate-devel mailing list
resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel
--
Mariano Stokle
SIP Rules
_______________________________________________
resiprocate-devel mailing list
resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel
_______________________________________________
resiprocate-devel mailing list
resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel
_______________________________________________
resiprocate-devel mailing list
resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel