Re: [reSIProcate] Duplicate project files in Windows
I renamed the 7.0 files to _7_0 and fixed them to actually be 7_0 instead of
the 7.1 checked in on top of them. Most (not all of them work again)
I also added stuff from version 8.0
On 3/11/05 11:09 AM, "Fischl jason" <jason.fischl@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> There are still people (or at least one) using the 7.0 sln and project
> files. If you use VS.NET 2002 it is required.
>
>
>
> On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 11:57:08 -0500, Scott Godin <slgodin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Good point. As far as I can tell the non-7_1 .sln and .proj files can be
>> removed from SVN.
>>
>> If no one is opposed to this - I will take care of it.
>>
>> Scott
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Fulvio Risso [mailto:fulvio.risso@xxxxxxxxx]
>> Sent: Friday, March 11, 2005 7:13 AM
>> To: resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: [reSIProcate] Duplicate project files in Windows
>>
>> Hi all.
>> Is there any reason for keeping two different project files for most of the
>> modules in reSIProcate?
>> For example, what's the difference between resiprocate.vcproj and
>> resiprocate_7_1.vcproj (apart the fact that the second compiles, while the
>> first doesn't?)
>>
>> In the first stage, I though it was for supporting two different versions of
>> Visual Studio; however, everything appears to be created for VS.NET 2003,
>> hence this is not the reason.
>>
>> Any suggestion?
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> fulvio
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> resiprocate-devel mailing list
>> resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel
>> _______________________________________________
>> resiprocate-devel mailing list
>> resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel
>>
> _______________________________________________
> resiprocate-devel mailing list
> resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel