Re: [reSIProcate] Duplicate project files in Windows
An excellent point! :-)
Yes, please go ahead and make the default projects/solutions be
correct for VS.NET 2003. Can somebody with VS.NET 2002 please check in
versions called resiprocate_7_0.vcproj, etc.
Jason
> Yes, but my point is that it seems to me that all the projects are done for
> Visual Studio .NET 2003.
> Let's take, for instance, resiprocate.vcproj and resiprocate_7_1.vcproj.
>
> resiprocate.vcproj:
> ===================
> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
> <VisualStudioProject
> ProjectType="Visual C++"
> ==> Version="7.10"
> Name="resiprocate"
> ProjectGUID="{2A8BE839-6466-4001-B224-8F1C3168D04A}"
> Keyword="Win32Proj">
> <Platforms>
> <Platform
> Name="Win32"/>
> </Platforms>
>
> resiprocate_7_1.vcproj:
> =======================
> ? <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
> <VisualStudioProject
> ProjectType="Visual C++"
> ==> Version="7.10"
> Name="resiprocate"
> ProjectGUID="{2A8BE839-6466-4001-B224-8F1C3168D04A}"
> Keyword="Win32Proj">
> <Platforms>
> <Platform
> Name="Win32"/>
> </Platforms>
>
> ==> these files are different (they have different settings; for instance
> the resiprocate_7_1.vcproj compiles, while resiprocate.vcproj doesn't), but
> this does not appear to be related to the Visual Studio version.
>
> Any (more) suggestions?
> ;-)
>
> fulvio
>
> PS This is just to understand which set of projects has to be fixed, becaure
> both are out of date; as soon as I understand which is the right one, I can
> send the patches ;-)
>
>
> >
> >
> > On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 12:14:27 -0500, Scott Godin <slgodin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > wrote:
> > > Are you sure you can't just use the 7_1 files - they don't really appear
> > to
> > > be any different?
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Fischl jason [mailto:jason.fischl@xxxxxxxxx]
> > > Sent: Friday, March 11, 2005 12:10 PM
> > > To: Scott Godin
> > > Cc: Fulvio Risso; resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Subject: Re: [reSIProcate] Duplicate project files in Windows
> > >
> > > There are still people (or at least one) using the 7.0 sln and project
> > > files. If you use VS.NET 2002 it is required.
> > >
> > > On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 11:57:08 -0500, Scott Godin <slgodin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > wrote:
> > > > Good point. As far as I can tell the non-7_1 .sln and .proj files can
> > be
> > > > removed from SVN.
> > > >
> > > > If no one is opposed to this - I will take care of it.
> > > >
> > > > Scott
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Fulvio Risso [mailto:fulvio.risso@xxxxxxxxx]
> > > > Sent: Friday, March 11, 2005 7:13 AM
> > > > To: resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > Subject: [reSIProcate] Duplicate project files in Windows
> > > >
> > > > Hi all.
> > > > Is there any reason for keeping two different project files
> > for most of
> > > the
> > > > modules in reSIProcate?
> > > > For example, what's the difference between resiprocate.vcproj and
> > > > resiprocate_7_1.vcproj (apart the fact that the second compiles, while
> > the
> > > > first doesn't?)
> > > >
> > > > In the first stage, I though it was for supporting two different
> > versions
> > > of
> > > > Visual Studio; however, everything appears to be created for VS.NET
> > 2003,
> > > > hence this is not the reason.
> > > >
> > > > Any suggestion?
> > > >
> > > > Cheers,
> > > >
> > > > fulvio
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > resiprocate-devel mailing list
> > > > resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > https://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > resiprocate-devel mailing list
> > > > resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > https://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel
> > > >
> > >
>
>