Re: [reSIProcate] strict routing?
- From: Alan Hawrylyshen <alan@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 22:07:29 -0700
On Jan 5, 2005, at 09:49, Christian_Gavin@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
According to the standards, shouldn't presSvr also consider the route:
in
the message (yeah, I know it is a simple test application) ?
Christian;
The scenario you describe sounds like a configuration problem in the
SER setup.
I don't think a UA is required to deal with a request that contains a
Route header.
The implication is that the request needs further forwarding. If it
did, it would pop
the route, manipulate and resend. In this case the request it would
act on would not
have a Route header. As expected.
HTH,
Alan
--
a l a n a t j a s o m i d o t c o m