Re: [reSIProcate] Instant Message "Session Model" in DUM

[Klaus Darilion <klaus.mailinglists@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Kaiduan!

Do you have a description about the microsoft session model?

Shouldn't the RTC API fall back to page model if the callee answers with 
"Not Acceptable here"?

regards,
klaus

kaiduan xie wrote:
> Klaus,
>
> Windows RTC 1.2 is using session model. But there is
> one minor problem, if you initiate a session model IM
> without intention to make a voice call to the other
> party, some hardware SIP phones will ring, and when
> the called picks up the phone, there is no "voice",
> this is annoying.
>
> kaiduan
>  --- Klaus Darilion <klaus.mailinglists@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote: 
>
> > Jason Fischl wrote:
> >
> >
> > > Klaus Darilion wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > > Hi!
> > > >
> > > > Does DUM supports the instant message "session
> >
> > model" as used by 
> >
> > > > Windows Messenger? If not - is it planned?
> > > > I went throught the code (ClientPagerMessage) and
> >
> > to me this looks 
> >
> > > > like the "page model".
> > >
> > > We intend to implement session mode IM using MSRP.
> >
> > Sometime in the next 
> >
> > > couple of months.
> >
> > Do you know which version is used by the Microsoft
> > RTC API? Is there 
> > somewhere a RFC/draft for the RTC method?
> >
> > regards,
> > klaus
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > resiprocate-devel mailing list
> > resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> https://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel
>
> >
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________ 
> Post your free ad now! http://personals.yahoo.ca