< Previous by Date Date Index Next by Date >
< Previous in Thread Thread Index  

RE: [reSIProcate] openssl


Nothing really at all....the directory structure is different is all. I just
figured it would be worth noting somewhere that you needed one version or
another, and I hadn't seen it on the site anywhere.

-Tom

thomasgal@xxxxxxxxxxxx  

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Cullen Jennings [mailto:fluffy@xxxxxxxxx] 
> Sent: Thursday, November 25, 2004 9:00 AM
> To: ThomasGal@xxxxxxxxxxxx; resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [reSIProcate] openssl
> 
> On 11/23/04 7:38 PM, "Thomas Gal" <ThomasGal@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > Is it noted anywhere on the site that you need to compile against 
> > openssl 0.9.7c(or any particular version)? In 0.9.7e for 
> example has a 
> > different directory structure.
> > 
> > -Tom
> > 
> > thomasgal@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> > _______________________________________________
> > resiprocate-devel mailing list
> > resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel
> 
> It should compile against things from 0.9.6 and later but 
> some of the functionality requires 0.9.7. I'm using 0.9.7c - 
> I have not been testing against 0.9.6 stuff so I imagine 
> there are some problems there.
> 
> What do we need to do to get it working with 0.9.7e?
> 
> 
> 
> 

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature