Re: [reSIProcate] RE: dum/resip design meeting

[andrea <andrea@xxxxxx>]

First of all, I apologize for this mail... I'd send it to the list, but 
I've noit check to and cc!


david Butcher wrote:
> Hi Andrea,
>
> A fine set of questions. There is some effort required to design the new 
> interfaces and deal with the smart pointer issues. The remainder is more or 
> less just shuffling around existing code. Very little of the DUM core should be 
> touched, so might go pretty quickly.
>
> My hope is that we can have something testable at the end of the next design 
> meeting. 

This sounds very interesting... I'm rewriting a client based on 
resiprocate stack and porting it to DUM. I think also that more docs and 
samples will help!
thanks

Andrea

> There will definitely be a big change in interface. Presumably, we will arrange 
> to maintain the old interface for some time and also produce some porting 
> recommendations.
>
> Feel free to post this thread to the list.
>
> thanks,
> david
>
>
>
>
>
> Quoting andrea <andrea@xxxxxx>:
>
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I've a question on this mail... it sounds very interesting but I've a 
> > question by "resiprocate user point of view"!
> > I'm spending my time studying dum interface but if I understand well, 
> > you're planning to modify it a lot!
> > when do you think it will be ready to test (and to use)?
> > thanks