Re: [reSIProcate] Minor suggestion to use ++i instead of i++

[Cullen Jennings <fluffy@xxxxxxxxx>]

I took the following program

int main()
{
   int i,j;
   j=0;
   for( i=0; i<100; i++ )
   {
      j = j+5;
   }

   return j;
}

and compiled it on a few different compilers with ++I and I++ and in *every*
case, I got executables that bit wise compared to exactly the same thing.

I suspect that this pre/post increment it total folk lore that is no longer
true on any modern compiler.



On 11/4/04 4:37 PM, "Alan Hawrylyshen" <alan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> 
> On Nov 4, 2004, at 15.58, kaiduan xie wrote:
> 
>> Hi, all,
>> 
>> After reviewing the source code, I found a lot of
>> places using i++ in loop of iterators, just to suggest
>> use ++i instead. Thanks,
>> 
>> kaiduan
>> 
> 
> I would tend to agree -- if you are editing some code that's doing an
> post-increment on an iterator, it's work changing to to pre-increment
> if there is no call for the value before incrementing.
> 
> 
> 
>> 
> a l a n a t j a s o m i d o t c o m
> 
> _______________________________________________
> resiprocate-devel mailing list
> resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel