< Previous by Date	Date Index	Next by Date >
< Previous in Thread	Thread Index	Next in Thread >

Re: [reSIProcate] dum-based client instability - Application Time r not thread safe

From: Jason Fischl <jason@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2004 10:06:57 -0800

Scott Godin wrote:

Oops - never mind - my app and other must protect calls to send / process
from different threads anyway - so it shouldn't really be a concern.  Sorry.

You don't need to protect calls to any of these methods. The mutexing isdone in the Fifos.


Jason

References:
- RE: [reSIProcate] dum-based client instability - Application Time r not thread safe
  - From: Scott Godin

Prev by Date: RE: [reSIProcate] dum-based client instability - Application Time r not thread safe
Next by Date: RE: [reSIProcate] dum-based client instability - Application Time r not thread safe
Previous by thread: RE: [reSIProcate] dum-based client instability - Application Time r not thread safe
Next by thread: RE: [reSIProcate] dum-based client instability - Application Time r not thread safe
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread