RE: [reSIProcate] DUM for sippy/gag
- From: "Derek MacDonald" <Derek@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 14:57:37 -0700
The design of DUM is getting pretty close, but there is a lot of
implementation left. The InviteSession stuff will be in alpha soon, and I
plan to re-work some of the lifetime management, but that should be done
soon. I'll ping the list when I get the basic test running, there are a lot
of corner cases with assert(0)'s that need to be resolved could use another
pair of eyes, and some it is probably wrong.
Server and Client subscriptions are sashimi grade, and I need them soon for
call transfer, but I'd like to talk about how they interact with the
InviteSession usage in that case.
--derek
-----Original Message-----
From: resiprocate-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:resiprocate-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of
Robert Sparks
Sent: Friday, June 11, 2004 2:30 PM
To: 'resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx' Resiprocate
Subject: [reSIProcate] DUM for sippy/gag
Is DUM ready for me to port gag to it?
If not, what needs yet to be done?
RjS
_______________________________________________
resiprocate-devel mailing list
resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel