[reSIProcate] How close does reSIProcate follow RFC 3263?

[Dave Mason <Dave.Mason@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi,

>From what I see the reSIProcate DNS access looks very good.  Are there any
known deviations of its implementation from the behavior specified in 3263
and the other related RFCs?  I see the web page says it has full support for
3261, 3263, 2915, 2782 but, being paranoid, I thought I'd look before I
leap.  (I tried to search the archives but didn't see a search feature.)

Also, if anyone here is familiar with the SipSrvLookup::servers method in
the sipX stack, a general comparison to reSIProcate would help.  I see that
sipX returns a list of servers, each with a corresponding weighted
preference.  Does reSIProcate have a similar feature, or does it just return
the list in sorted order?  It would be better for me if the reSIProcate DNS
code did the sort, so my application wouldn't have to.

Regards,
Dave