by Date

< Previous Page	(to Thread Index)	Next Page >

---

2007-04-26

• Re: [reSIProcate] repro TLS : sending responses
  • From: Byron Campen
• Re: [reSIProcate] why reject redirect on in-dialog NOTIFY?
  • From: Bruce Lowekamp

2007-04-25

• Re: [reSIProcate] repro TLS : sending responses
  • From: Boris Rozinov
• Re: [reSIProcate] why reject redirect on in-dialog NOTIFY?
  • From: Robert Sparks
• [reSIProcate] why reject redirect on in-dialog NOTIFY?
  • From: Bruce Lowekamp
• Re: [reSIProcate] using AppDialogSet
  • From: Scott Godin
• [reSIProcate] using AppDialogSet
  • From: Nilay Tripathi
• Re: [reSIProcate] Compile failed
  • From: Jason Fischl
• [reSIProcate] Compile failed
  • From: Sean
• Re: [reSIProcate] How to implement voice/video phone via resiprocate?
  • From: Scott Godin
• [reSIProcate] How to implement voice/video phone via resiprocate?
  • From: Sean

2007-04-24

• Re: [reSIProcate] [reSIProcate-commit] resiprocate 7084 nash: Security.cxx/hxx:
  • From: Nash Tsai
• Re: [reSIProcate] [reSIProcate-commit] resiprocate 7084 nash: Security.cxx/hxx:
  • From: Jason Fischl
• Re: [reSIProcate] SDP in ACK after intial offer/answer exchange causesBYE from resip/dum
  • From: Yuan, Frank

2007-04-20

• Re: [reSIProcate] [reSIProcate-commit] resiprocate 7042 nash: DialogUsageManager:
  • From: Nash Tsai
• [reSIProcate] SDP in ACK after intial offer/answer exchange causes BYE from resip/dum
  • From: Justin Matthews

2007-04-20

• Re: [reSIProcate] [reSIProcate-commit] resiprocate 7084 nash: Security.cxx/hxx:
  • From: Derek MacDonald
• Re: [reSIProcate] [reSIProcate-commit] resiprocate 7042 nash: DialogUsageManager:
  • From: Derek MacDonald
• Re: [reSIProcate] [reSIProcate-commit] resiprocate 7042 nash: DialogUsageManager:
  • From: Nash Tsai
• Re: [reSIProcate] [reSIProcate-commit] resiprocate 7084 nash: Security.cxx/hxx:
  • From: Nash Tsai

2007-04-19

• Re: [reSIProcate] Remote-Party-Id Header - Should it be a part of theStack
  • From: Byron Campen
• Re: [reSIProcate] Remote-Party-Id Header - Should it be a part of theStack
  • From: Mehul Jain
• Re: [reSIProcate] [reSIProcate-commit] resiprocate 7042 nash: DialogUsageManager:
  • From: Derek MacDonald
• Re: [reSIProcate] Remote-Party-Id Header - Should it be a part of theStack
  • From: Byron Campen
• Re: [reSIProcate] Remote-Party-Id Header - Should it be a part of theStack
  • From: Justin Matthews
• [reSIProcate] Remote-Party-Id Header - Should it be a part of the Stack
  • From: Mehul Jain
• Re: [reSIProcate] [reSIProcate-commit] resiprocate 7084 nash: Security.cxx/hxx:
  • From: Jason Fischl
• Re: [reSIProcate] Fwd: [reSIProcate-commit] resiprocate 7077 nash:inside resip/stack/Transaction::process method contains complex
  • From: Derek MacDonald

2007-04-18

• Re: [reSIProcate] about berkeley db thread safe
  • From: Scott Godin
• Re: [reSIProcate] about berkeley db thread safe
  • From: Ryan Kereliuk
• [reSIProcate] about berkeley db thread safe
  • From: hongsion
• Re: [reSIProcate] To start with
  • From: Byron Campen
• Re: [reSIProcate] DUM - Cancelling INVITE if no response ever received
  • From: Byron Campen
• Re: [reSIProcate] Shared Pointers (was Re: Fwd: [reSIProcate-commit] resiprocate 7077 nash:inside resip/stack/Transaction::process method contains complex)
  • From: Adam Roach
• Re: [reSIProcate] DUM - Cancelling INVITE if no response ever received
  • From: Jason Fischl
• Re: [reSIProcate] DUM - Cancelling INVITE if no response ever received
  • From: Nash Tsai
• Re: [reSIProcate] DUM - Cancelling INVITE if no response ever received
  • From: Jason Fischl
• [reSIProcate] DUM - Cancelling INVITE if no response ever received
  • From: Nash Tsai
• [reSIProcate] To start with
  • From: Ramsundar
• Re: [reSIProcate] Shared Pointers (was Re: Fwd: [reSIProcate-commit] resiprocate 7077 nash:inside resip/stack/Transaction::process method contains complex)
  • From: Nash Tsai
• Re: [reSIProcate] Shared Pointers (was Re: Fwd: [reSIProcate-commit] resiprocate 7077 nash:inside resip/stack/Transaction::process method contains complex)
  • From: Adam Roach
• Re: [reSIProcate] Shared Pointers (was Re: Fwd: [reSIProcate-commit] resiprocate 7077 nash:inside resip/stack/Transaction::process method contains complex)
  • From: Nash Tsai

2007-04-17

• Re: [reSIProcate] Fwd: [reSIProcate-commit] resiprocate 7077 nash:inside resip/stack/Transaction::process method contains complex
  • From: Adam Roach
• Re: [reSIProcate] Fwd: [reSIProcate-commit] resiprocate 7077 nash:inside resip/stack/Transaction::process method contains complex
  • From: Nash Tsai
• [reSIProcate] Shared Pointers (was Re: Fwd: [reSIProcate-commit] resiprocate 7077 nash:inside resip/stack/Transaction::process method contains complex)
  • From: Adam Roach
• Re: [reSIProcate] Fwd: [reSIProcate-commit] resiprocate 7077 nash:inside resip/stack/Transaction::process method contains complex
  • From: Ryan Kereliuk
• Re: [reSIProcate] Fwd: [reSIProcate-commit] resiprocate 7077 nash:inside resip/stack/Transaction::process method contains complex
  • From: Nash Tsai
• Re: [reSIProcate] Fwd: [reSIProcate-commit] resiprocate 7077 nash:inside resip/stack/Transaction::process method contains complex
  • From: Nash Tsai
• Re: [reSIProcate] Fwd: [reSIProcate-commit] resiprocate 7077 nash:inside resip/stack/Transaction::process method contains complex
  • From: Robert Sparks

2007-04-16

• Re: [reSIProcate] Fwd: [reSIProcate-commit] resiprocate 7077 nash:inside resip/stack/Transaction::process method contains complex
  • From: Scott Godin
• Re: [reSIProcate] Fwd: [reSIProcate-commit] resiprocate 7077 nash: inside resip/stack/Transaction::process method contains complex
  • From: Jason Fischl
• [reSIProcate] Fwd: [reSIProcate-commit] resiprocate 7077 nash: inside resip/stack/Transaction::process method contains complex
  • From: Byron Campen

2007-04-13

• Re: [reSIProcate] Why does DUM keep sending SUBSCRIBE messages?
  • From: Dien Ba Quang

2007-04-12

• Re: [reSIProcate] Why does DUM keep sending SUBSCRIBE messages?
  • From: Aron Rosenberg
• Re: [reSIProcate] Why does DUM keep sending SUBSCRIBE messages?
  • From: Dien Ba Quang
• Re: [reSIProcate] repro TLS : sending responses
  • From: Byron Campen
• Re: [reSIProcate] repro TLS : sending responses
  • From: Boris Rozinov
• Re: [reSIProcate] (another) blacklist issue on resip 1.1
  • From: Tom Joyner
• Re: [reSIProcate] repro TLS : sending responses
  • From: Byron Campen
• Re: [reSIProcate] repro TLS : sending responses
  • From: Byron Campen
• [reSIProcate] build warnings on FreeBSD 6.1
  • From: Alfred E. Heggestad
• [reSIProcate] repro TLS : sending responses
  • From: Boris Rozinov

2007-04-11

• [reSIProcate] Why does DUM keep sending SUBSCRIBE messages?
  • From: Dien Ba Quang

2007-04-10

• Re: [reSIProcate] [repro-devel] specifying routes in repro
  • From: Scott Godin
• Re: [reSIProcate] build app error with 7051
  • From: Byron Campen
• Re: [reSIProcate] build app error with 7051
  • From: Scott Godin
• Re: [reSIProcate] specifying routes in repro
  • From: Scott Godin
• Re: [reSIProcate] build app error with 7051
  • From: Byron Campen
• [reSIProcate] specifying routes in repro
  • From: Capo Don
• [reSIProcate] build app error with 7051
  • From: maodong hu

2007-04-09

• Re: [reSIProcate] Register crash after the third time login?
  • From: Dien Ba Quang
• [reSIProcate] Accessing the Berkeley Database
  • From: Capo Don
• Re: [reSIProcate] Register crash after the third time login?
  • From: Dien Ba Quang
• Re: [reSIProcate] Register crash after the third time login?
  • From: Scott Godin
• Re: [reSIProcate] Terminate all registrations
  • From: Jason Fischl
• [reSIProcate] Register crash after the third time login?
  • From: Dien Ba Quang
• Re: [reSIProcate] about thread safe of repro!
  • From: Scott Godin
• Re: [reSIProcate] Terminate all registrations
  • From: Scott Godin

2007-04-07

• [reSIProcate] Terminate all registrations
  • From: Boris Rozinov
• [reSIProcate] about thread safe of repro!
  • From: hongsion

2007-04-06

• Re: [reSIProcate] (another) blacklist issue on resip 1.1
  • From: Tom Joyner
• Re: [reSIProcate] (another) blacklist issue on resip 1.1
  • From: Byron Campen
• [reSIProcate] (another) blacklist issue on resip 1.1
  • From: Tom Joyner
• Re: [reSIProcate] multiple instances of resiprocate in repro proxy
  • From: Scott Godin

2007-04-05

• [reSIProcate] Dum shutdown question
  • From: Kovar, William \(Bill\)
• Re: [reSIProcate] multiple instances of resiprocate in repro proxy
  • From: Scott Godin
• [reSIProcate] multiple instances of resiprocate in repro proxy
  • From: Bhargavi

2007-04-04

• Re: [reSIProcate] (no subject)
  • From: Robert Sparks
• [reSIProcate] (no subject)
  • From: Gustavo Honorato

2007-04-03

• Re: [reSIProcate] Using Update for provideOffer()
  • From: Kovar, William \(Bill\)
• Re: [reSIProcate] Using Update for provideOffer()
  • From: Scott Godin
• [reSIProcate] Using Update for provideOffer()
  • From: Kovar, William \(Bill\)

2007-04-02

• Re: [reSIProcate] Wish to merge some of the changes we made from TelTel client branch
  • From: Scott Godin

2007-04-01

• Re: [reSIProcate] Wish to merge some of the changes we made from TelTel client branch
  • From: Scott Godin

2007-03-30

• [reSIProcate] resiprocate-1.1 is now available!
  • From: Byron Campen
• Re: [reSIProcate] Wish to merge some of the changes we made from TelTel client branch
  • From: Scott Godin

2007-03-29

• Re: [reSIProcate] resiprocate stack the performance using TCP or TLS?
  • From: Ryan Kereliuk
• [reSIProcate] resiprocate stack the performance using TCP or TLS?
  • From: Yuan, Frank
• Re: [reSIProcate] resiprocate 1.1 final release this Friday
  • From: Alan Hawrylyshen
• [reSIProcate] resiprocate 1.1 final release this Friday
  • From: Byron Campen

< Previous Page	(to Thread Index)	Next Page >

---

Mail converted by MHonArc