| < Previous by Date | Date Index | Next by Date > |
| < Previous in Thread | Thread Index | Next in Thread > |
|
FYI – there is a command line option: parallel-fork-static-routes
- "paralled fork to all matching static routes and (first batch)
registrations" Scott From:
repro-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:repro-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Byron Campen Constraining
discussion to repro-users. So, you're
wanting to have repro fork, but put a Route header to the B2BUA in? Right now,
StaticRoute doesn't let you do this; you only get to rewrite the request uri.
You cannot combine the results of the StaticRoute and LocationServer routing
mechanisms. It may be useful to teach StaticRoute to insert Route headers. Best regards, Byron Campen
Hi, I have a setup
where in Repro is acting as a Registrar and Proxy. And I have a proprietary
developed B2BUA over DUM. Now I have
configured static routes in Repro saying that any request apart from REGISTER
comes just forward it to B2BUA. So it is fine till now. I am trying a forking
scenario (both parallel and serial) in Repro. What is happening is in case of
forking Repro is trying to place calls directly with the UA, and not letting
B2BUA in the path in spite of static routes configured for the B2BUA. Forking works
perfectly fine if Repro is run in a stand alone mode, but if I run with my
B2BUA with static routes configured it is not working as expected. Please help me in
figuring out what is happening? I fell that it is a bug in Repro!!!!! Thanks and Regards, -Sandeep A _______________________________________________ repro-users mailing list |